Puntillo Kathleen, Pasero Chris, Li Denise, Mularski Richard A, Grap Mary Jo, Erstad Brian L, Varkey Basil, Gilbert Hugh C, Medina Justine, Sessler Curtis N
Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Pain Management Educator and Clinical Consultant, El Dorado Hills, CA.
Chest. 2009 Apr;135(4):1069-1074. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2369.
Pain is a common and distressing symptom in ICU patients. Yet a major challenge exists in assessing and evaluating the pain. Although the patient's self-report of pain is the "gold standard" for pain assessment, other methods must be considered when patients are unable to self-report. Currently only two pain behavior instruments have been tested for their reliability, validity, and feasibility of use in ICUs: the pain behavior scale and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool. Other tools, albeit with less validity testing, include the pain assessment, intervention, and notation (PAIN) algorithm and a pain behaviors checklist. When established tools are insufficient to evaluate a patient's pain, alternative methods of augmenting a pain evaluation should be considered. These can include the completion of a pain risk profile, use of surrogates, or performance of an analgesic trial. Meticulous attention to the evaluation of a critically ill patient's pain provides the basis for selection of pain interventions and the subsequent assessment of the intervention's effectiveness.
疼痛是重症监护病房(ICU)患者常见且令人痛苦的症状。然而,在评估和评价疼痛方面存在重大挑战。尽管患者对疼痛的自我报告是疼痛评估的“金标准”,但当患者无法自我报告时,必须考虑其他方法。目前,只有两种疼痛行为评估工具在ICU中的可靠性、有效性和使用可行性方面经过了测试:疼痛行为量表和重症监护疼痛观察工具。其他工具,尽管有效性测试较少,包括疼痛评估、干预和记录(PAIN)算法以及疼痛行为检查表。当现有工具不足以评估患者的疼痛时,应考虑采用其他增强疼痛评估的方法。这些方法可以包括完成疼痛风险评估、使用替代指标或进行镇痛试验。对重症患者疼痛评估的细致关注为选择疼痛干预措施以及随后评估干预效果提供了依据。