面部、腿部、活动、哭声、可安抚性行为工具评估危重症患者急性疼痛的可靠性和有效性。
Reliability and validity of the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability behavioral tool in assessing acute pain in critically ill patients.
机构信息
University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, USA.
出版信息
Am J Crit Care. 2010 Jan;19(1):55-61; quiz 62. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2010624.
BACKGROUND
Few investigators have evaluated pain assessment tools in the critical care setting.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale in assessing pain in critically ill adults and children unable to self-report pain.
METHODS
Three nurses simultaneously, but independently, observed and scored pain behaviors twice in 29 critically ill adults and 8 children: before administration of an analgesic or during a painful procedure, and 15 to 30 minutes after the administration or procedure. Two nurses used the FLACC scale, the third used either the Checklist of Nonverbal Pain Indicators (for adults) or the COMFORT scale (for children).
RESULTS
For 73 observations, FLACC scores correlated highly with the other 2 scores (rho = 0.963 and 0.849, respectively), supporting criterion validity. Significant decreases in FLACC scores after analgesia (or at rest) supported construct validity of the tool (mean, 5.27; SD, 2.3 vs mean, 0.52; SD, 1.1; P < .001). Exact agreement and kappa statistics, as well as intraclass correlation coefficients (0.67-0.95), support excellent interrater reliability of the tool. Internal consistency was excellent; the Cronbach alpha was 0.882 when all items were included.
CONCLUSIONS
Although similar in content to other behavioral pain scales, the FLACC can be used across populations of patients and settings, and the scores are comparable to those of the commonly used 0-to-10 number rating scale.
背景
很少有研究人员评估过重症监护环境中的疼痛评估工具。
目的
评估面部、腿部、活动、哭声、可安慰性(FLACC)行为量表在评估无法自我报告疼痛的重症成人和儿童疼痛时的可靠性和有效性。
方法
3 名护士同时但独立地观察并记录了 29 名重症成人和 8 名儿童的疼痛行为 2 次:在给予镇痛剂之前或在进行疼痛操作期间,以及给予镇痛剂或操作后 15 至 30 分钟。2 名护士使用 FLACC 量表,第 3 名护士使用非语言疼痛指标检查表(成人用)或 COMFORT 量表(儿童用)。
结果
对于 73 次观察,FLACC 评分与其他 2 个评分高度相关(rho 值分别为 0.963 和 0.849),支持了标准效度。镇痛后(或在休息时)FLACC 评分显著下降,支持了该工具的构建效度(平均为 5.27,SD 为 2.3,与平均为 0.52,SD 为 1.1 相比,P <.001)。确切一致性和 Kappa 统计以及组内相关系数(0.67-0.95)均支持该工具具有极好的评分者间可靠性。内部一致性极好;当包含所有项目时,Cronbach α 为 0.882。
结论
尽管与其他行为疼痛量表在内容上相似,但 FLACC 可用于患者和环境的不同人群,且评分可与常用的 0 至 10 数字评分量表相媲美。