Lee Seung-Min, Ha Mina, Kim Eun-Jung, Jeong Woo-Chul, Hur Jongil, Park Seok Gun, Kwon Hojang, Hong Yun-Chul, Ha Eun-Hee, Lee Jong Seung, Chung Bong Chul, Lee Jeongae, Im Hosub, Choi Yeyong, Cho Yong-Min, Cheong Hae-Kwan
Citizen's Institute for Environmental Studies, Korean Federation for Environmental Movement, Korea.
J Prev Med Public Health. 2009 Mar;42(2):89-95. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.2.89.
To assess the protective effects of wearing protective devices among the residents and volunteers who participated in the cleanup of the Hebei Spirit oil spill.
A total of 288 residents and 724 volunteers were surveyed about symptoms, whether they were wearing protective devices and potential confounding variables. The questionnaires were administered from the second to the sixth week following the accident. Spot urine samples were collected and analyzed for metabolites of 4 volatile organic compounds (VOCs), 2 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and 6 heavy metals. The association between the wearing of protective devices and various symptoms was assessed using a multiple logistic regression adjusted for confounding variables. A multiple generalized linear regression model adjusted for the covariates was used to test for a difference in least-square mean concentration of urinary biomarkers between residents who wore protective devices and those who did not.
Thirty nine to 98% of the residents and 62-98% of volunteers wore protective devices. Levels of fatigue and fever were higher among residents not wearing masks than among those who did wear masks (odds ratio 4.5; 95% confidence interval 1.23-19.86). Urinary mercury levels were found to be significantly higher among residents not wearing work clothes or boots (p<0.05).
Because the survey was not performed during the initial high-exposure period, no significant difference was found in metabolite levels between people who wore protective devices and those who did not, except for mercury, whose biological half-life is more than 6 weeks.
评估参与河北精神号油轮溢油清理工作的居民和志愿者佩戴防护设备的保护作用。
共对288名居民和724名志愿者进行了调查,询问他们的症状、是否佩戴防护设备以及潜在的混杂变量。问卷调查在事故发生后的第二至六周进行。采集即时尿样,分析其中4种挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)、2种多环芳烃(PAHs)和6种重金属的代谢物。使用经混杂变量调整的多元逻辑回归评估佩戴防护设备与各种症状之间的关联。使用经协变量调整的多元广义线性回归模型,检验佩戴防护设备的居民与未佩戴防护设备的居民之间尿生物标志物最小二乘平均浓度的差异。
39%至98%的居民和62%至98%的志愿者佩戴了防护设备。未戴口罩的居民中疲劳和发热水平高于戴口罩的居民(比值比4.5;95%置信区间1.23 - 19.86)。未穿工作服或靴子的居民尿汞水平显著更高(p<0.05)。
由于调查不是在最初的高暴露期进行的,除汞(其生物半衰期超过6周)外,佩戴防护设备的人和未佩戴防护设备的人之间代谢物水平未发现显著差异。