Rhee John M, Heflin John A, Hamasaki Takahiko, Freedman Brett
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory Spine Center, 59 Executive Park South, Suite 3000, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 20;34(9):890-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c944b.
Prospective case-control study.
To determine the prevalence and utility of commonly tested myelopathic signs in surgically treated patients with cervical myelopathy (CM).
Although physical signs are sought in making the diagnosis of CM, their importance remains unclear, as patients with CM may have normal examinations while those without CM can demonstrate "myelopathic" signs.
Patients presenting with cervical complaints and advanced imaging were evaluated over a 6-month interval in a single surgical practice. The CM group consisted of those with (1) a history of myelopathic symptoms and (2) correlative spinal cord compression on imaging, who then (3) underwent surgery and (4) improved Nurick score by > or = 1 grade after surgery. The controls consisted of patients with neck/radicular complaints but no myelopathic symptoms and no cord compression on imaging. Myelopathic signs included hyperreflexia or provocative signs (Hoffman inverted brachioradialis reflex, clonus, Babinski).
There were 39 CM patients and 37 controls. Myelopathic signs were more prevalent in the CM group (79% vs. 57%; P = 0.05), with significantly higher rates of all provocative signs but not hyperreflexia. Overall, myelopathic signs were not highly sensitive in diagnosing the presence of CM, as 21% of CM patients failed to demonstrate any myelopathic signs. There was no correlation between the presence of myelopathic signs and diabetes or preoperative Nurick score. However, those with cord signal changes were significantly more likely to demonstrate myelopathic signs.
Although myelopathic signs are significantly more common in CM patients, they may be negative in approximately one-fifth and can not be relied on to make the diagnosis. In patients who lack myelopathic signs but otherwise seem myelopathic with no alternative explanations, symptoms combined with correlative imaging studies must be used to base treatment decisions, as the absence of signs does not preclude the diagnosis of myelopathy nor its successful surgical treatment.
前瞻性病例对照研究。
确定在接受手术治疗的脊髓型颈椎病(CM)患者中常见的脊髓病体征的患病率及实用性。
尽管在CM的诊断中会寻找体征,但它们的重要性仍不明确,因为CM患者的检查结果可能正常,而无CM的患者也可能表现出“脊髓病”体征。
在单一外科诊所,对有颈部症状且影像学检查显示病情进展的患者进行为期6个月的评估。CM组包括:(1)有脊髓病症状病史;(2)影像学检查显示有相关脊髓压迫;(3)接受了手术;(4)术后Nurick评分提高≥1级的患者。对照组包括有颈部/神经根症状但无脊髓病症状且影像学检查无脊髓压迫的患者。脊髓病体征包括反射亢进或激发体征(霍夫曼征、肱桡肌反射倒错、阵挛、巴宾斯基征)。
有39例CM患者和37例对照。脊髓病体征在CM组中更常见(79%对57%;P = 0.05),所有激发体征的发生率显著更高,但反射亢进除外。总体而言,脊髓病体征在诊断CM时的敏感性不高,因为21%的CM患者未表现出任何脊髓病体征。脊髓病体征的存在与糖尿病或术前Nurick评分之间无相关性。然而,有脊髓信号改变的患者更有可能表现出脊髓病体征。
尽管脊髓病体征在CM患者中明显更常见,但约五分之一的患者可能为阴性,不能依靠其进行诊断。对于缺乏脊髓病体征但其他方面似乎患有脊髓病且无其他解释的患者,必须结合症状和相关影像学检查来做出治疗决策,因为体征的缺失并不排除脊髓病的诊断及其成功的手术治疗。