Kato Yoshinobu, Iwata Eiichiro, Yano Yudai, Koizumi Munehisa, Araki Masafumi, Sada Takuya, Mui Takahiro, Masuda Keisuke, Kawasaki Sachiko, Okuda Akinori, Shigematsu Hideki, Tanaka Yasuhito
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nara City Hospital, Nara, Japan.
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2024 Oct 29;9(2):157-163. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2024-0187. eCollection 2025 Mar 27.
INTRODUCTION: Cervical myelopathy diagnosis is based on specific symptoms, physical signs, and imaging findings. However, information on the accuracy and reliability of physical signs, particularly the Wartenberg reflex and the finger escape sign (FES), is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Hoffmann and Trömner signs, FES, Wartenberg reflex, and combination of any one positive of these four physical signs. METHODS: We reviewed the Hoffmann and Trömner signs, FES, and Wartenberg reflex from the medical records of patients with cervical cord compression who underwent surgery. We included those who underwent lumbar spine surgery as controls, except those with upper extremity symptoms or a history of cerebrospinal disease. Subsequently, we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of cervical cord compression. The primary and secondary observers performed two and one trial, respectively, to measure the intra- and interobserver reliabilities. RESULTS: This study included 46 cases and 42 controls. The diagnostic sensitivities for the Hoffmann sign, Trömner sign, Wartenberg reflex, FES, and combination of any one positive were 46%, 72%, 63%, 22%, and 83%, respectively; the diagnostic specificities were 98%, 79%, 95%, 98%, and 79%, respectively; the intraobserver kappa value (κ) was 0.80, 0.82, 0.86, 0.66, and 0.95, respectively; and the interobserver κ was 0.84, 0.51, 0.51, -0.02, and 0.60, respectively. Notably, all κ values, except the interobserver κ for the FES, were obtained with <0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Each physical sign had high specificity but low sensitivity in predicting cervical cord compression. Therefore, they may be useful for definitive diagnosis but not for screening tests. The combination of the four physical signs exhibited improved sensitivity and may be useful for screening tests. However, the results of these physical signs should be carefully interpreted owing to the low level of interobserver reliability.
引言:脊髓型颈椎病的诊断基于特定的症状、体征和影像学表现。然而,关于体征的准确性和可靠性的信息,尤其是瓦滕伯格反射和手指逃逸征(FES),却很缺乏。因此,本研究旨在评估霍夫曼征、特罗默征、FES、瓦滕伯格反射以及这四种体征中任何一项阳性的组合的有效性和可靠性。 方法:我们回顾了接受手术的颈髓受压患者病历中的霍夫曼征、特罗默征、FES和瓦滕伯格反射。我们纳入了接受腰椎手术的患者作为对照,但排除有上肢症状或脑脊液疾病史的患者。随后,我们计算了颈髓受压的敏感性和特异性。主要观察者和次要观察者分别进行了两次和一次试验,以测量观察者内和观察者间的可靠性。 结果:本研究纳入了46例病例和42例对照。霍夫曼征、特罗默征、瓦滕伯格反射、FES以及任何一项阳性组合的诊断敏感性分别为46%、72%、63%、22%和83%;诊断特异性分别为98%、79%、95%、98%和79%;观察者内kappa值(κ)分别为0.80、0.82、0.86、0.66和0.95;观察者间κ分别为0.84、0.51、0.51、 -0.02和
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2024-10-29
Clin Spine Surg. 2017-11
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015-4-1
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2023-7-1
J Neurosurg Spine. 2008-9
Eur Spine J. 2010-3-13
EFORT Open Rev. 2022-8-4
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020
BMJ. 2018-2-22
Neurol Clin Pract. 2015-8
Clin Spine Surg. 2017-11