Vinces Fausto Y, Madlinger Robert V
Department of Surgery, Lutheran Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009 Mar;15(2):109-12.
To determine the role of a combined laparoscopic exploration and lavage (LELA) in abdominal stab wounds (ASW). We hypothesized that peritoneal penetration (PP) is not an indication for exploratory laparotomy (EL) if LELA is negative.
A prospective study (Jan 2002-Dec 2003) was carried at our Level I Trauma Center. Patients with anterior fascia penetration in wound exploration and with systolic blood pressure greater than 90 mmHg were included. Patients with back and flank injuries, evisceration and presentation after six hours were excluded. LELA was considered positive if red blood cell count was >5000 and white blood cell count was >150 in a lavage without the presence of bile, gross blood, food fibers or stool.
Eighty-nine patients with anterior ASW (AASW) were included. Twenty-eight patients underwent laparoscopy to rule out PP. Seventeen patients had PP and 8 demonstrated injuries that required immediate exploratory laparotomy. The remaining 9 underwent LELA. Four patients had positive LELA that demonstrated injuries (sigmoid, right colon, and small bowel [n: 2]). Five patients had a negative LELA and avoided an unnecessary EL.
LELA in AASW shows a promising role to rule out mainly hollow viscus injuries. This technique could decrease the number of non-therapeutic laparotomies, length of stay and hospital costs without increasing the incidence of missed abdominal injuries.
确定联合腹腔镜探查与灌洗(LELA)在腹部刺伤(ASW)中的作用。我们假设,如果LELA结果为阴性,则腹膜穿透(PP)并非剖腹探查术(EL)的指征。
在我们的一级创伤中心进行了一项前瞻性研究(2002年1月至2003年12月)。纳入伤口探查时前筋膜有穿透且收缩压大于90 mmHg的患者。排除背部和侧腹受伤、脏器外露及伤后6小时就诊的患者。如果灌洗液中红细胞计数>5000且白细胞计数>150,且不存在胆汁、肉眼可见血液、食物纤维或粪便,则LELA被视为阳性。
纳入89例前腹部刺伤(AASW)患者。28例患者接受腹腔镜检查以排除PP。17例患者有PP,8例患者有需要立即进行剖腹探查术的损伤。其余9例患者接受了LELA。4例患者LELA结果为阳性,显示有损伤(乙状结肠、右结肠和小肠[n:2])。5例患者LELA结果为阴性,避免了不必要的EL。
AASW中的LELA在排除主要的中空脏器损伤方面显示出有前景的作用。该技术可减少非治疗性剖腹探查术的数量、住院时间和住院费用,而不增加漏诊腹部损伤的发生率。