Lee Jong-Min, Tong Seo-Yun, Lee Kwang-Beom, Kim Young-Tae, Kim Young-Jae, Kim Jae Weon, Kim Seok-Mo, Cho Chi-Heum, Kim Ki-Tae, Cho Young-Lae, Lee Kyu-Chan
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, East-West Neo Medical Center, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(6):707-12. doi: 10.1080/00016340902898016.
To evaluate whether concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT) improves overall survival as compared to radiation therapy (RT) alone in stage III cervical cancers.
A multicenter retrospective review.
Nine tertiary medical centers in Korea.
A total of 277 patients treated for stage III cervical cancer without para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis based on clinical staging workup from 1996 to 2003.
Medical and histopathological record review.
Disease-specific overall survival.
CRT and RT alone were performed in 172 and 105 patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in disease-specific overall survival between the CRT and RT alone arms based on clinical staging workup, even though the CRT arm was characterized by younger age, more favorable performance status and lower pretreatment blood urea nitrogen level as compared to the RT alone arm. In the CRT arm, three patients succumbed to treatment-related death.
CRT does not improve the overall survival rate in stage III cervical cancer as compared to RT alone based on clinical staging workup for PALN status. Special care needs to be taken regarding optimal dose and duration of RT, use of brachytherapy, anemia control and accurate pretreatment staging workup to improve survival outcome in patients with stage III cervical cancer.
评估在III期宫颈癌患者中,与单纯放疗(RT)相比,同步放化疗(CRT)是否能提高总生存率。
多中心回顾性研究。
韩国的9家三级医疗中心。
1996年至2003年期间,共有277例经临床分期检查确诊为III期宫颈癌且无主动脉旁淋巴结(PALN)转移的患者。
回顾医疗和组织病理学记录。
疾病特异性总生存率。
分别有172例和105例患者接受了CRT和单纯RT治疗。基于临床分期检查,CRT组和单纯RT组在疾病特异性总生存率方面无显著差异,尽管与单纯RT组相比,CRT组患者年龄更小、身体状况更好且治疗前血尿素氮水平更低。在CRT组中,有3例患者死于治疗相关原因。
基于PALN状态的临床分期检查,与单纯RT相比,CRT并不能提高III期宫颈癌患者的总生存率。对于III期宫颈癌患者,需要特别关注放疗的最佳剂量和疗程、近距离放疗的使用、贫血控制以及准确的治疗前分期检查,以改善生存结局。