Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Rome La Sapienza, Head N Scuderi, Viale del Policlinico 155 Rome 00161, Italy.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 May;63(5):746-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.01.073. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
Skin tumours of the anterior auricular concha are not uncommon. Wider excision and immediate reconstruction are required to reduce the risks of recurrence of the disease, cartilage infection and external ear distortion. Many surgical methods have been described for reconstruction of conchal defects. Post-auricular island flaps, such as the revolving-door (RD) flap, and full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs) are the most-performed procedures. Although the RD flap has been fully described, it is not widely accepted and many surgeons, in their daily practice, prefer to use FTSG. It is a common experience that FTSGs are more subjected to centripetal contraction, decreasing the structural firmness of the conchal cavity and affecting functional and aesthetic outcomes. Furthermore, FTSGs are more prone to delay in wound healing due to the difficult access to this region that hinders adequate tie-over dressings. Between March 2003 and January 2007, 40 patients affected by T1 and T2 non-melanotic skin cancer and T1 melanoma of the anterior conchal surface of the external ear were included in a prospective study and randomly assigned to the RD reconstructed group or to the FTSG reconstructed group to investigate, compare and define advantages and disadvantages of both the techniques. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the overall outcome and the colour and texture match. No flap or skin graft total loss was observed. Six patients (30%) showed partial failure of FTSG. The RD group demonstrated excellent cosmetic outcome, ideal colour match, adequate structure of external ear, projection and shape. Wilcoxon matched-pairs rank-sum test demonstrated statistically significant higher scores for the RD group compared to the FTSG group (p<0.0001). The RD harvesting technique is easy and quicker than the FTSG technique. RD flap should be considered as the first choice for reconstruction of anterior auricular conchal defects following wider excision of skin tumours.
耳廓前沟皮肤肿瘤并不少见。为降低疾病复发、软骨感染和外耳变形的风险,需要进行广泛切除和即刻重建。许多外科方法已被用于重建耳甲腔缺损。耳后岛状皮瓣,如旋转门(RD)皮瓣和全厚皮片(FTSG)是最常进行的手术。虽然 RD 皮瓣已被充分描述,但它并未被广泛接受,许多外科医生在日常实践中更倾向于使用 FTSG。一个常见的经验是,FTSG 更容易发生向心性收缩,降低耳甲腔的结构牢固度,并影响功能和美学效果。此外,由于该区域难以触及,妨碍了适当的加压包扎,FTSG 更容易出现伤口愈合延迟。2003 年 3 月至 2007 年 1 月,40 例 T1 和 T2 非黑素瘤皮肤癌和 T1 黑色素瘤患者的耳廓前表面皮肤受累,前瞻性研究中将他们随机分为 RD 重建组或 FTSG 重建组,以调查、比较和定义两种技术的优缺点。视觉模拟评分(VAS)用于评估整体结果和颜色、纹理匹配。未观察到皮瓣或皮片全部丢失。6 例(30%)FTSG 出现部分失败。RD 组显示出极佳的美容效果、理想的颜色匹配、外耳的适当结构、突出和形状。Wilcoxon 匹配对等级和检验显示,RD 组的评分明显高于 FTSG 组(p<0.0001)。RD 皮瓣的采集技术比 FTSG 技术更容易、更快。对于广泛切除皮肤肿瘤后耳廓前沟皮肤缺损的重建,RD 皮瓣应被视为首选。