Patten Christi A, Petersen Larra R, Hughes Christine A, Ebbert Jon O, Morgenthaler Bonnema Sarah, Brockman Tabetha A, Decker Paul A, Anderson Kari J, Offord Kenneth P, Boness Jeannie, Pyan Karin, Beddow Carmen
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology and Behavioral Health Research Program, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Charlton 6-273, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Apr;11(4):427-32. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp029. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
Nonsmokers have a potentially supportive role in tobacco cessation efforts. The present study examined the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of a telephone-based intervention for nonsmoking support persons.
A total of 59 support persons (mean age = 36 years, 92% female, 95% White) were randomly assigned to a control condition (N = 30; written materials only) or to a social cognitive theory-based intervention (N = 29; written materials and 5 weekly, 20- to 30-min telephone counseling sessions). Both support persons and smokers completed assessments separately by mail at baseline and at weeks 6 (end of treatment) and 26.
Two thirds of the smokers reported low-moderate levels of motivation to quit at baseline as assessed by the contemplation ladder. Study retention rates were excellent, with 95% of both support persons and smokers completing the week 26 assessment. Moreover, 86% of support persons in the intervention group completed all five telephone sessions. Treatment acceptability was high for both support persons and smokers. Compared with the control condition, the intervention was associated with a significant increase in support person self-efficacy to help their smoker (p = .034) and outcome expectancies (p = .025) from baseline to week 6. However, the intervention was not associated with higher smoking abstinence rates or quit attempts.
The program was successful in reaching smokers with lower levels of readiness to quit. The intervention was feasible and acceptable to both support persons and smokers. Although support persons and smokers can be engaged in this type of outreach program, refinements in the intervention approach are needed to improve the smoking outcomes.
非吸烟者在戒烟努力中可能发挥支持作用。本研究考察了针对非吸烟支持者的电话干预措施的可行性、可接受性及潜在效果。
总共59名支持者(平均年龄 = 36岁,92%为女性,95%为白人)被随机分配至对照组(N = 30;仅提供书面材料)或基于社会认知理论的干预组(N = 29;提供书面材料并进行为期5周、每周20至30分钟的电话咨询)。支持者和吸烟者均在基线期、第6周(治疗结束时)和第26周分别通过邮件完成评估。
通过思考阶梯评估,三分之二的吸烟者在基线期报告有低至中度的戒烟动机。研究保留率极佳,95%的支持者和吸烟者完成了第26周的评估。此外,干预组中86%的支持者完成了全部五次电话咨询。支持者和吸烟者对治疗的接受度都很高。与对照组相比,从基线期到第6周,干预措施使支持者帮助吸烟者的自我效能感显著提高(p = 0.034),结果期望也显著提高(p = 0.025)。然而,该干预措施与更高的戒烟率或戒烟尝试无关。
该项目成功覆盖了戒烟意愿较低的吸烟者。该干预措施对支持者和吸烟者而言都是可行且可接受的。尽管支持者和吸烟者都可以参与此类推广项目,但仍需改进干预方法以改善吸烟相关结果。