• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将吸烟者与戒烟热线联系起来:一项针对非吸烟者的支持人员干预措施的随机对照有效性试验。

Linking smokers to a quitline: randomized controlled effectiveness trial of a support person intervention that targets non-smokers.

作者信息

Patten Christi A, Boyle Raymond, Tinkelman David, Brockman Tabetha A, Lukowski Amy, Decker Paul A, D'Silva Joanne, Lichtenstein Edward, Zhu Shu-Hong

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Department of Research Programs, ClearWay Minnesota SM, Minneapolis, MN 55425, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 2017 Aug 1;32(4):318-331. doi: 10.1093/her/cyx050.

DOI:10.1093/her/cyx050
PMID:28854569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5914310/
Abstract

Evidence-based treatments (e.g. quitlines) are greatly underutilized by smokers limiting their public health impact. A three-session phone intervention for nonsmoking family members and friends (i.e. support persons) was successful for increasing smoker quitline enrollment. To enhance the intervention's potential translatability, in this study, we delivered treatment for the non-smoker within ongoing quitline services and compared the efficacy of the three-call intervention to a streamlined version (one call). A total of 704 adult non-smokers (85% female, 95% White) wanting to help a smoker quit and recruited statewide in Minnesota participated in this randomized controlled trial with parallel groups. Non-smokers received mailed written materials and were randomly assigned to a control condition (no additional treatment, n = 235), or to a one- (n = 233) or three-call (n = 236) intervention delivered by quitline coaches. The main outcome was smoker quitline enrollment through 7-month follow-up. Smoker quitline enrollment was similar for those linked to non-smokers in the one- and three-call interventions (14.6% [34/233] and 14.8% [35/236]), and higher than for smokers linked to control participants (6.4% [15/235]), P = 0.006. Just one quitline coaching call delivered to non-smokers increased treatment enrollment among smokers. The reach of quitlines could be enhanced by targeting the social support network of smokers.

摘要

基于证据的治疗方法(如戒烟热线)未得到吸烟者的充分利用,限制了其对公共卫生的影响。一项针对不吸烟的家庭成员和朋友(即支持人员)的三阶段电话干预成功提高了吸烟者对戒烟热线的登记率。为了提高该干预措施的潜在可推广性,在本研究中,我们在现有的戒烟热线服务中为不吸烟者提供治疗,并将三阶段电话干预的效果与简化版(一个阶段电话)进行比较。共有704名成年不吸烟者(85%为女性,95%为白人)希望帮助吸烟者戒烟,他们在明尼苏达州全州范围内招募,参与了这项平行组随机对照试验。不吸烟者收到邮寄的书面材料,并被随机分配到对照组(无额外治疗,n = 235),或由戒烟热线教练提供的一个阶段电话(n = 233)或三个阶段电话(n = 236)干预组。主要结果是通过7个月的随访来统计吸烟者对戒烟热线的登记情况。在一个阶段电话和三个阶段电话干预中,与不吸烟者相关的吸烟者对戒烟热线的登记率相似(分别为14.6%[34/233]和14.8%[35/236]),且高于与对照组参与者相关的吸烟者(6.4%[15/235]),P = 0.006。向不吸烟者提供一次戒烟热线教练电话就增加了吸烟者的治疗登记率。通过针对吸烟者的社会支持网络,可以提高戒烟热线的覆盖面。

相似文献

1
Linking smokers to a quitline: randomized controlled effectiveness trial of a support person intervention that targets non-smokers.将吸烟者与戒烟热线联系起来:一项针对非吸烟者的支持人员干预措施的随机对照有效性试验。
Health Educ Res. 2017 Aug 1;32(4):318-331. doi: 10.1093/her/cyx050.
2
Support-person promotion of a smoking quitline: a randomized controlled trial.支持人员推广戒烟热线:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jul;41(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.012.
3
A randomized controlled trial of directive and nondirective smoking cessation coaching through an employee quitline.一项通过员工戒烟热线进行指导性和非指导性戒烟辅导的随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 11;16:550. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3202-y.
4
Tobacco User Characteristics and Outcomes Related to Intensity of Quitline Program Use: Results From Minnesota and Pennsylvania.与戒烟热线项目使用强度相关的烟草使用者特征及结果:明尼苏达州和宾夕法尼亚州的研究结果
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Sep-Oct;22(5):E36-46. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000382.
5
Telephone recruitment into a randomized controlled trial of quitline support.通过电话招募参加戒烟热线支持随机对照试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Oct;37(4):324-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.05.022.
6
Active telephone recruitment to quitline services: are nonvolunteer smokers receptive to cessation support?通过电话主动招募戒烟热线服务对象:非自愿吸烟者是否愿意接受戒烟支持?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Oct;11(10):1205-15. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp125. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
7
Using "warm handoffs" to link hospitalized smokers with tobacco treatment after discharge: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.使用“温暖交接”在出院后将住院吸烟者与烟草治疗联系起来:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Aug 1;13:127. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-127.
8
Increasing the reach of quitlines through active telephone recruitment: do cold-called smokers differ from quitline callers?通过主动电话招募扩大戒烟热线的服务范围:被随机呼叫的吸烟者与戒烟热线来电者有何不同?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Dec;14(12):1488-93. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr317. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
9
Simultaneous vs. sequential treatment for smoking and weight management in tobacco quitlines: 6 and 12 month outcomes from a randomized trial.同时治疗与序贯治疗在戒烟热线中用于吸烟和体重管理:一项随机试验的 6 和 12 个月结果。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 31;18(1):678. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5574-7.
10
The Potential Impact of the New York State Smokers' Quitline on Population-Level Smoking Rates in New York.纽约州戒烟热线对纽约州人群吸烟率的潜在影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 14;16(22):4477. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224477.

引用本文的文献

1
Google Trends Analysis of Interest in Smoking Cessation, Treatment Options, and Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Following Tax Increase and Introduction of Pictorial Health Warnings in Germany.德国提高烟草税并引入图片健康警示后,谷歌趋势对戒烟、治疗选择及电子尼古丁传送系统关注度的分析
Tob Use Insights. 2025 Jun 5;18:1179173X251338447. doi: 10.1177/1179173X251338447. eCollection 2025.
2
Health and Wellness Coaching and Sustained Gains: A Rapid Systematic Review.健康与 Wellness 教练指导及持续收益:一项快速系统评价
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2023 Jun 20;18(2):162-180. doi: 10.1177/15598276231180117. eCollection 2024 Mar-Apr.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Current cigarette smoking among adults - United States, 2005-2014.成年人当前吸烟状况 - 美国,2005-2014 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Nov 13;64(44):1233-40. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6444a2.
2
A Comprehensive Lifestyle Peer Group-Based Intervention on Cardiovascular Risk Factors: The Randomized Controlled Fifty-Fifty Program.基于生活方式同伴群体的综合心血管危险因素干预:随机对照五十对五十计划。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 9;67(5):476-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.033. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
3
A Social Network Family-Focused Intervention to Promote Smoking Cessation in Chinese and Vietnamese American Male Smokers: A Feasibility Study.
Brief intervention to enhance cessation of smokeless tobacco use in newly diagnosed patients with head and neck cancers: A randomized controlled trial in patient-relative dyads.
简短干预措施以促进新诊断的头颈癌患者戒除无烟烟草:一项针对患者及其亲属二元组的随机对照试验。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2023 Jul;65(7):742-748. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_578_22. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
4
Aniqsaaq (To Breathe): Study protocol to develop and evaluate an Alaska Native family-based financial incentive intervention for smoking cessation.阿尼卡萨阿克(呼吸):开发和评估一种基于阿拉斯加原住民家庭的戒烟经济激励干预措施的研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Apr 3;33:101129. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101129. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Assessment and Counseling Gaps Among Former Smokers Eligible for Lung Cancer Screening in US Adults : A Cross-Sectional Analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES), 2013-2018.美国成年人有资格进行肺癌筛查的前吸烟者评估和咨询差距:对 2013-2018 年全国健康和营养调查(NHANES)的横断面分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Aug;37(11):2711-2718. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07542-0. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
6
Targeting Nonsmokers to Help Smokers Quit: Features of a Large-scale Intervention.针对非吸烟者以帮助吸烟者戒烟:一项大规模干预措施的特点
Tob Use Insights. 2020 Jul 23;13:1179173X20943565. doi: 10.1177/1179173X20943565. eCollection 2020.
7
Brief Intervention for Tobacco when Diagnosed with Oral Cancer (BITDOC): Study protocol of a randomized clinical trial studying efficacy of brief tobacco cessation intervention, Chhattisgarh, India.口腔癌诊断时的烟草简短干预(BITDOC):一项关于简短戒烟干预效果的随机临床试验研究方案,印度恰蒂斯加尔邦
Tob Prev Cessat. 2020 Jan 15;6:4. doi: 10.18332/tpc/115028. eCollection 2020.
8
Compendium of Health and Wellness Coaching: 2019 Addendum.《健康与健康指导手册:2019年附录》
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2019 May 26;14(2):155-168. doi: 10.1177/1559827619850489. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.
9
Skill Sets for Family Members and Friends to Help Motivate a Smoker to Seek Treatment: Research to Practice.家庭成员和朋友帮助吸烟者寻求治疗的技能组合:从研究到实践。
Addict Res Theory. 2018;26(6):525-532. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2018.1450872. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
10
Support person interventions to increase use of quitline services among racially diverse low-income smokers: A pilot study.支持人员干预措施以增加不同种族低收入吸烟者对戒烟热线服务的使用:一项试点研究。
Addict Behav Rep. 2019 Feb 12;9:100171. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2019.100171. eCollection 2019 Jun.
一项以社交网络为基础、聚焦家庭的干预措施,用于促进华裔和越南裔美国男性吸烟者戒烟:一项可行性研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Aug;17(8):1029-38. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv088.
4
Lessons learned from recruiting socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers into a pilot randomized controlled trial to explore the role of Exercise Assisted Reduction then Stop (EARS) smoking.从招募社会经济地位不利的吸烟者参与一项探索运动辅助戒烟然后戒断(EARS)吸烟作用的试点随机对照试验中吸取的经验教训。
Trials. 2015 Feb 12;16:1. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-16-1.
5
Interacting effects of receiving social control and social support during smoking cessation.戒烟期间接受社会控制和社会支持的交互作用。
Ann Behav Med. 2015 Feb;49(1):141-6. doi: 10.1007/s12160-014-9635-6.
6
Social network characteristics associated with health promoting behaviors among Latinos.社交网络特征与拉丁裔人群健康促进行为的相关性。
Health Psychol. 2014 Jun;33(6):544-53. doi: 10.1037/hea0000092.
7
The role of social networks in adult health: introduction to the special issue.社交网络在成年人健康中的作用:特刊导言。
Health Psychol. 2014 Jun;33(6):501-4. doi: 10.1037/hea0000103.
8
The importance of tobacco research focusing on marginalized groups.关注边缘化群体的烟草研究的重要性。
Addiction. 2014 Jul;109(7):1049-51. doi: 10.1111/add.12548. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
9
Exploring the "active ingredients" of an online smoking intervention: a randomized factorial trial.探索在线吸烟干预的“有效成分”:一项随机析因试验。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Aug;16(8):1129-39. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu057. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
10
Are health behavior change interventions that use online social networks effective? A systematic review.使用在线社交网络的健康行为改变干预措施是否有效?一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 14;16(2):e40. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2952.