Welch Torrence D J, Ting Lena H
The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0535, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jun;101(6):3294-309. doi: 10.1152/jn.90775.2008. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
Although the neural basis of balance control remains unknown, recent studies suggest that a feedback law on center-of-mass (CoM) kinematics determines the temporal patterning of muscle activity during human postural responses. We hypothesized that the same feedback law would also explain variations in muscle activity to support-surface translation as perturbation characteristics vary. Subject CoM motion was experimentally modulated using 34 different anterior-posterior support-surface translations of varying peak acceleration and velocity but the same total displacement. Electromyographic (EMG) recordings from several muscles of the lower limbs and trunk were compared to predicted EMG patterns from an inverted pendulum model under delayed feedback control. In both recorded and predicted EMG patterns, the initial burst of muscle activity scaled linearly with peak acceleration, whereas the tonic "plateau" region scaled with peak velocity. The relatively invariant duration of the initial burst was modeled by incorporating a transient, time-limited encoding of CoM acceleration inspired by muscle spindle primary afferent dynamic responses. The entire time course of recorded and predicted muscle activity compared favorably across all conditions, suggesting that the initial burst of muscle activity is not generated by feedforward neural mechanisms. Perturbation conditions were presented randomly and subjects maintained relatively constant feedback gains across all conditions. In contrast, an optimal feedback solution based on a trade-off between CoM stabilization and energy expenditure predicted that feedback gains should change with perturbation characteristics. These results suggest that an invariant feedback law was used to generate the entire time course of muscle activity across a variety of postural disturbances.
尽管平衡控制的神经基础尚不清楚,但最近的研究表明,质心(CoM)运动学上的反馈规律决定了人类姿势反应过程中肌肉活动的时间模式。我们假设,随着扰动特征的变化,相同的反馈规律也能解释肌肉活动对支撑面平移的变化。通过34种不同的前后支撑面平移来实验性地调节受试者的CoM运动,这些平移具有不同的峰值加速度和速度,但总位移相同。将来自下肢和躯干几块肌肉的肌电图(EMG)记录与延迟反馈控制下倒立摆模型预测的EMG模式进行比较。在记录的和预测的EMG模式中,肌肉活动的初始爆发与峰值加速度呈线性比例,而强直性“平台”区域与峰值速度呈比例。通过纳入受肌梭初级传入动态反应启发的CoM加速度的瞬态、限时编码,对初始爆发相对不变的持续时间进行了建模。在所有条件下,记录的和预测的肌肉活动的整个时间进程都比较吻合,这表明肌肉活动的初始爆发不是由前馈神经机制产生的。扰动条件是随机呈现的,受试者在所有条件下保持相对恒定的反馈增益。相比之下,基于CoM稳定和能量消耗之间权衡的最优反馈解决方案预测,反馈增益应随扰动特征而变化。这些结果表明,一个不变的反馈规律被用来产生各种姿势干扰下肌肉活动的整个时间进程。