Suppr超能文献

剖宫产术中的腹膜关闭或不关闭。

Peritoneal closure or non-closure at caesarean section.

作者信息

van Bogaert L-J, Misra A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saint Rita's Hospital, Glen Cowie, South Africa.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Apr;29(3):217-9. doi: 10.1080/01443610802716000.

Abstract

At caesarean section, the closure or non-closure of the parietal and/or the visceral peritoneum has short-term and long-term advantages and disadvantages. The majority of reports have compared double closure vs double non-closure, non-closure of the parietal, or non-closure of the visceral parietal, with special emphasis on operation time, febrile morbidity, and duration of hospital stay. The present study compares the three methods in 692 consecutive caesarean sections in a South African rural hospital, with special emphasis on wound sepsis, operation time and febrile morbidity. The prevalence of wound sepsis and febrile morbidity was 4.9% and 2.5%, respectively. The only significant difference between the three groups was that double closure resulted in the longest operation time.

摘要

在剖宫产手术中,关闭或不关闭脏层和/或壁层腹膜有短期和长期的利弊。大多数报告比较了双层关闭与双层不关闭、壁层不关闭或脏壁层不关闭,特别关注手术时间、发热发病率和住院时间。本研究在南非一家农村医院对692例连续剖宫产手术的三种方法进行了比较,特别关注伤口感染、手术时间和发热发病率。伤口感染和发热发病率分别为4.9%和2.5%。三组之间唯一的显著差异是双层关闭导致手术时间最长。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验