van Bogaert L-J, Misra A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saint Rita's Hospital, Glen Cowie, South Africa.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Apr;29(3):217-9. doi: 10.1080/01443610802716000.
At caesarean section, the closure or non-closure of the parietal and/or the visceral peritoneum has short-term and long-term advantages and disadvantages. The majority of reports have compared double closure vs double non-closure, non-closure of the parietal, or non-closure of the visceral parietal, with special emphasis on operation time, febrile morbidity, and duration of hospital stay. The present study compares the three methods in 692 consecutive caesarean sections in a South African rural hospital, with special emphasis on wound sepsis, operation time and febrile morbidity. The prevalence of wound sepsis and febrile morbidity was 4.9% and 2.5%, respectively. The only significant difference between the three groups was that double closure resulted in the longest operation time.
在剖宫产手术中,关闭或不关闭脏层和/或壁层腹膜有短期和长期的利弊。大多数报告比较了双层关闭与双层不关闭、壁层不关闭或脏壁层不关闭,特别关注手术时间、发热发病率和住院时间。本研究在南非一家农村医院对692例连续剖宫产手术的三种方法进行了比较,特别关注伤口感染、手术时间和发热发病率。伤口感染和发热发病率分别为4.9%和2.5%。三组之间唯一的显著差异是双层关闭导致手术时间最长。