• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产术中关闭与不关闭脏腹膜和壁腹膜的短期影响:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Short-term effects of closure versus non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: a prospective randomized study.

作者信息

Anteby Eyal Y, Kruchkovich Jenya, Kapustian Viki, Gdalevich Michael, Shenhav Simon, Gemer Ofer

机构信息

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barzilai Medical Center, The Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Ashkelon, Israel.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009 Dec;35(6):1026-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01062.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01062.x
PMID:20144167
Abstract

AIM

To determine the effect of non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum during cesarean section on short-term postoperative morbidity.

METHODS

A prospective randomized trial was conducted of 533 women undergoing primary cesarean section; 277 were randomized to closure and 256 to non-closure of the peritoneum. Perioperative outcome measures, such as analgesia dosage and morbidly measures were compared.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the non-closure and closure groups in the mean number of narcotic analgesia doses (1.09 +/- 1.2 vs 1.05 +/- 1.0, P = 0.63; respectively), mean number of non-narcotic analgesia doses (4.69 +/- 2.7 vs 4.65 +/- 2.8, P = 0.89; respectively), number of women with postoperative fever >38 degrees C (18 vs 14, P = 0.37; respectively), number of women with wound infection (29 vs 35, P = 0.54; respectively) and mean number of hospitalization days (4.16 +/- 0.91 vs 4.14 +/- 0.71, P = 0.78; respectively).

CONCLUSION

Closure or non-closure of the peritoneum at cesarean sections has no significant impact on postoperative analgesic usage and short-term morbidity.

摘要

目的

确定剖宫产术中不缝合脏腹膜和壁腹膜对术后短期发病率的影响。

方法

对533例行初次剖宫产的妇女进行了一项前瞻性随机试验;277例被随机分配至缝合组,256例被随机分配至不缝合组。比较围手术期结局指标,如镇痛剂量和发病率指标。

结果

不缝合组和缝合组在麻醉性镇痛剂平均剂量(分别为1.09±1.2和1.05±1.0,P=0.63)、非麻醉性镇痛剂平均剂量(分别为4.69±2.7和4.65±2.8,P=0.89)、术后发热>38℃的妇女数量(分别为18例和14例,P=0.37)、伤口感染的妇女数量(分别为29例和35例,P=0.54)以及平均住院天数(分别为4.16±0.91和4.14±0.71,P=0.78)方面均无显著差异。

结论

剖宫产时缝合或不缝合腹膜对术后镇痛药物使用和短期发病率无显著影响。

相似文献

1
Short-term effects of closure versus non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: a prospective randomized study.剖宫产术中关闭与不关闭脏腹膜和壁腹膜的短期影响:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009 Dec;35(6):1026-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01062.x.
2
Prospective study of non-closure or closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery in 124 women: Impact of prior peritoneal closure at primary cesarean on the interval time between first cesarean section and the next pregnancy and significant adhesion at second cesarean.124名妇女剖宫产术中腹膜不关闭或关闭的前瞻性研究:首次剖宫产时腹膜关闭对首次剖宫产与下次妊娠间隔时间以及第二次剖宫产时显著粘连的影响。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2006 Aug;32(4):396-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2006.00420.x.
3
Closure vs non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean delivery: 16 year study.剖宫产术中脏腹膜与壁腹膜缝合与否:16年研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Sep;87(9):1007-11.
4
Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study.剖宫产时关腹与不关腹对粘连的影响:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;206(1):56.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.032. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
5
[Caesarean section: closure or non-closure of peritoneum? A randomized trial of postoperative morbidity].剖宫产术:腹膜缝合还是不缝合?一项关于术后发病率的随机试验
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2005 Oct;33(10):745-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2005.08.001.
6
A randomized study of closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery.剖宫产术中腹膜关闭的随机研究。
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jun;77(6):818-21.
7
Peritoneal closure or non-closure at caesarean section.剖宫产术中的腹膜关闭或不关闭。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Apr;29(3):217-9. doi: 10.1080/01443610802716000.
8
Closure versus non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section--evaluation of pain. A randomized study.剖宫产术中腹膜关闭与不关闭对疼痛的影响——一项随机研究
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998 Aug;77(7):741-5.
9
Non-closure versus closure of peritoneum during cesarean section: a randomized study.剖宫产术中腹膜不缝合与缝合的随机对照研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Sep-Oct;128(1-2):267-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021. Epub 2006 May 22.
10
Double-layer closure of uterine incision with visceral and parietal peritoneal closure: are they obligatory steps of routine cesarean sections?子宫切口双层缝合(包括脏腹膜和壁腹膜缝合):它们是常规剖宫产的必要步骤吗?
J Matern Fetal Med. 1996 Nov-Dec;5(6):366-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199611/12)5:6<366::AID-MFM15>3.0.CO;2-F.

引用本文的文献

1
Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes.剖宫产术中腹膜关闭与不关闭的短期和长期结局
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 11;2014(8):CD000163. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000163.pub2.