Wiese M, Krämer J, Becker C, Nentwig V, Theodoridis T, Teske W
Institut für Wirbelsäulenforschung an der Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
Z Orthop Unfall. 2009 Mar-Apr;147(2):194-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039234. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
The aim of this paper is to present an update of the Back School concept including recent randomised controlled studies, systematic reviews and guidelines.
After definition and classification of the origins of the Back School concept, results of randomised controlled studies and systematic reviews within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group are presented with their consequences with regard to German and International guidelines for the rehabilitation and prevention of low-back pain.
The Back School, integrated into a multidisciplinary programme, is effective in the rehabilitation and prevention of recurrent and chronic low-back pain. It is not effective for acute back problems when compared to other treatment modalities. There is moderate evidence suggesting that back schools in an occupational setting reduce pain and improve function and return to work status.
The classic structure of the Back School with information, back protection exercises and gymnastics can be practiced successfully for chronic low-back pain and in an occupational setting. Insurance companies should consider the low-cost technology. For children, adolescents and for older people with osteoporosis and lumbar spinal stenosis, a special age-orientated design of the Back School is necessary.
本文旨在介绍“脊柱学校”概念的最新情况,包括近期的随机对照研究、系统评价和指南。
在对“脊柱学校”概念的起源进行定义和分类后,介绍了Cochrane协作网背部回顾小组框架内随机对照研究和系统评价的结果,以及这些结果对德国和国际腰痛康复与预防指南的影响。
融入多学科项目的“脊柱学校”在复发性和慢性腰痛的康复与预防方面是有效的。与其他治疗方式相比,它对急性背部问题无效。有中等证据表明,职业环境中的“脊柱学校”可减轻疼痛、改善功能并恢复工作状态。
“脊柱学校”的经典结构,即提供信息、背部保护练习和体操,可成功应用于慢性腰痛及职业环境。保险公司应考虑这种低成本技术。对于儿童、青少年以及患有骨质疏松症和腰椎管狭窄症的老年人,有必要针对不同年龄设计特殊的“脊柱学校”。