• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性前列腺切除术的人体工程学考量:医生对开放、腹腔镜及机器人辅助技术的观点

Ergonomics considerations of radical prostatectomy: physician perspective of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques.

作者信息

Bagrodia Aditya, Raman Jay D

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2009 Apr;23(4):627-33. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0556.

DOI:10.1089/end.2008.0556
PMID:19358686
Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze and compare physician perspectives of musculoskeletal ergonomic parameters associated with open, pure laparoscopic, and robot-assisted prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Survey questions were designed to evaluate physician musculoskeletal discomfort during open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. The survey instrument was distributed to physician members of the Endourological Society (ES) and Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) after approval from the respective organizations. We queried about the presence of chronic neck and/or back pain, relationship of musculoskeletal pain to operating, and pain characteristics associated with open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted prostatectomies. Physicians were also asked to rank the three operative approaches with respect to associated pain and discomfort and to comment if practice patterns were impacted by these ergonomic variables.

RESULTS

There were 106 urologists who completed the survey. Chronic neck and/or back pain was present in 43% of urologists who responded to this survey. Of those surgeons with baseline neck/back pain, 50% indicated that operating caused or exacerbated this musculoskeletal pain. Furthermore, 25% of respondents indicated that musculoskeletal pain considerations impacted their choice of operative approach. Neck and/or back pain was experienced in 50%, 56%, and 23% of surgeons after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted prostatectomy, respectively. When ranking operative approach in order of decreasing amounts of associated pain, 32% indicated open>laparoscopic>robot-assisted, 28% responded that none caused pain, and 25% selected laparoscopic>open>robot-assisted. Three percent selected permutations, with robot-assisted causing the most discomfort.

CONCLUSION

Urologists who responded to our study indicate that open and laparoscopic prostatectomy cause more musculoskeletal discomfort than a robot-assisted approach. Of urologists performing robot-assisted prostatectomies, however, 23% suggested that this approach also was associated with physical pain. Furthermore, physicians do take into account ergonomic considerations when determining an operative approach. Studies with actual physician monitoring and electromyography are requisite to more thoroughly delineate the ergonomics of performing a radical prostatectomy.

摘要

目的

分析并比较医生对于与开放性、单纯腹腔镜及机器人辅助前列腺切除术相关的肌肉骨骼人体工程学参数的看法。

材料与方法

设计调查问卷以评估医生在开放性及微创根治性前列腺切除术中的肌肉骨骼不适情况。在获得各自组织批准后,该调查问卷被分发给腔内泌尿外科协会(ES)和泌尿肿瘤学会(SUO)的医生成员。我们询问了慢性颈部和/或背部疼痛的存在情况、肌肉骨骼疼痛与手术的关系以及与开放性、腹腔镜及机器人辅助前列腺切除术相关的疼痛特征。还要求医生根据相关疼痛和不适对这三种手术方式进行排序,并评论这些人体工程学变量是否影响了手术模式。

结果

有106位泌尿科医生完成了调查。在回复此调查的泌尿科医生中,43%存在慢性颈部和/或背部疼痛。在那些基线时有颈部/背部疼痛的外科医生中,50%表示手术导致或加重了这种肌肉骨骼疼痛。此外,25%的受访者表示肌肉骨骼疼痛因素影响了他们对手术方式的选择。在开放性、腹腔镜及机器人辅助前列腺切除术后,分别有50%、56%和23%的外科医生经历了颈部和/或背部疼痛。当按照相关疼痛程度递减的顺序对手术方式进行排序时,32%的人表示开放性>腹腔镜>机器人辅助,28%的人回答没有一种方式会引起疼痛,25%的人选择腹腔镜>开放性>机器人辅助。3%的人选择了其他排列方式,其中机器人辅助引起的不适最多。

结论

参与我们研究的泌尿科医生表明,开放性和腹腔镜前列腺切除术比机器人辅助手术方式导致更多的肌肉骨骼不适。然而,在进行机器人辅助前列腺切除术的泌尿科医生中,23%表示这种手术方式也与身体疼痛有关。此外,医生在确定手术方式时确实会考虑人体工程学因素。需要进行实际医生监测和肌电图研究,以更全面地描述根治性前列腺切除术的人体工程学情况。

相似文献

1
Ergonomics considerations of radical prostatectomy: physician perspective of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques.根治性前列腺切除术的人体工程学考量:医生对开放、腹腔镜及机器人辅助技术的观点
J Endourol. 2009 Apr;23(4):627-33. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0556.
2
Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术住院时间的比较。
J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):929-31. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.070.
3
Malfunction of the Da Vinci robotic system during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: an international survey.达芬奇机器人系统在机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术中故障:国际调查。
J Endourol. 2010 Apr;24(4):571-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0489.
4
Short-term results after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的短期疗效比较。
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):660-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.036. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
5
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Korean population: a 5-year propensity-score matched comparative analysis versus open radical prostatectomy.韩国人群中机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:一项与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的5年倾向评分匹配比较分析。
Int J Urol. 2014 Aug;21(8):781-5. doi: 10.1111/iju.12447. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
6
Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: how does it compare with other surgical approaches?机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的现状:与其他手术方法相比如何?
Int J Urol. 2013 Mar;20(3):271-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03193.x. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
7
Short-term impact of a robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy 'mini-residency' experience on postgraduate urologists' practice patterns.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术“迷你住院医师培训”经历对泌尿外科研究生实践模式的短期影响。
Int J Med Robot. 2006 Mar;2(1):70-4. doi: 10.1002/rcs.71.
8
Comparative analysis of global practice patterns in urologic robot-assisted surgery.比较分析全球泌尿外科机器人辅助手术的实践模式。
J Endourol. 2010 Oct;24(10):1637-44. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0024.
9
Safety and peri-operative outcomes during learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study of fellowship-trained robotic surgeons versus experienced open radical prostatectomy surgeons incorporating robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术学习曲线期间的安全性和围手术期结果: fellowship 培训的机器人外科医生与经验丰富的开放根治性前列腺切除术外科医生相结合进行机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的多机构研究。
J Endourol. 2010 Oct;24(10):1665-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0657.
10
Current status of robot-assisted surgery in urology: a multi-national survey of 297 urologic surgeons.泌尿外科机器人辅助手术的现状:对297名泌尿外科医生的多国调查
Can J Urol. 2009 Aug;16(4):4736-41; discussion 4741.

引用本文的文献

1
Ergonomics in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis of musculoeskeletical and mental workload in prone vs. supine positions with two lithotripters-a pilot study.经皮肾镜取石术中的人体工程学:采用两种碎石机对俯卧位与仰卧位的肌肉骨骼及精神负荷进行比较分析——一项初步研究
World J Urol. 2025 Sep 9;43(1):545. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05922-9.
2
Physical and mental effects of different radical prostatectomy techniques on urologic surgeons.不同根治性前列腺切除术技术对泌尿外科医生的身心影响。
PeerJ. 2025 Aug 20;13:e19908. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19908. eCollection 2025.
3
[Evaluation of the feasibility and safety of a Chinese developed modular surgical robotic system for robot-assisted pyeloplasty].
[评估中国研发的模块化手术机器人系统用于机器人辅助肾盂成形术的可行性和安全性]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Aug 18;57(4):779-783. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.04.024.
4
Objective Assessment of Ergonomics and Performance of Thoracic Surgeons During Real-Life Anatomical Robotic Pulmonary Resections.现实生活中解剖学机器人辅助肺切除术中胸外科医生的人体工程学与操作表现的客观评估
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 Aug 5;40(8). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf180.
5
Comparative analysis of disruptive events in robotic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中断事件的比较分析
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jan 6;19(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02194-0.
6
Impact of preferred surgical modality on surgeon wellness: a survey of workload, physical pain/discomfort, and neuromusculoskeletal disorders.手术方式偏好对外科医生健康的影响:一项关于工作量、身体疼痛/不适和神经肌肉骨骼疾病的调查。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9244-9254. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10485-0. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
7
Impact of minimally invasive surgery on surgeon health (ISSUE) study: protocol of a single-arm observational study conducted in the live surgery setting.微创外科手术对外科医生健康的影响(ISSUE)研究:一项在活体手术环境中进行的单臂观察性研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 7;13(3):e066765. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066765.
8
A Multicenter Study Investigating the Surgeon Experience with a Robotic-Assisted Exoscope as Part of the Neurosurgical Armamentarium.一项多中心研究,调查外科医生使用机器人辅助手术内窥镜作为神经外科手术器械的一部分的经验。
World Neurosurg. 2023 May;173:e571-e577. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.02.094. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
9
Cost-utility analysis on robot-assisted and laparoscopic prostatectomy based on long-term functional outcomes.基于长期功能结局的机器人辅助前列腺切除术和腹腔镜前列腺切除术的成本效用分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 10;12(1):7658. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10746-3.
10
A decade retrospective of medical robotics research from 2010 to 2020.2010 年至 2020 年医学机器人研究的十年回顾。
Sci Robot. 2021 Nov 10;6(60):eabi8017. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abi8017.