• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Birthing ethics: what mothers, families, childbirth educators, nurses, and physicians should know about the ethics of childbirth.分娩伦理学:母亲、家庭、分娩教育者、护士和医生应了解的分娩伦理知识。
J Perinat Educ. 2009;18(1):12-24. doi: 10.1624/105812409X396192.
2
A theory of international bioethics: the negotiable and the non-negotiable.国际生物伦理学理论:可协商与不可协商的内容。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1998 Sep;8(3):233-73. doi: 10.1353/ken.1998.0018.
3
Stories and cases: discernment and inference in moral deliberation: Stories and Their Limits: Narrative Approaches to Bioethics, edited by Hilde Lindemann Nelson; and Fragmentation and Consensus: Communitarian and Casuist Bioethics, by Mark G. Kuczewski.故事与案例:道德审议中的辨别与推理:《故事及其局限:生物伦理学的叙事方法》,希尔德·林德曼·尼尔森编;以及《碎片化与共识:社群主义与决疑论生物伦理学》,马克·G·库切夫斯基著。
Theor Med Bioeth. 1999 Jun;20(3):299-308. doi: 10.1023/a:1009928000078.
4
Toward a Social Bioethics Through Interpretivism: A Framework for Healthcare Ethics.走向通过诠释主义的社会生命伦理学:医疗保健伦理学框架。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2024 Jan;33(1):6-16. doi: 10.1017/S0963180123000452. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
5
From applied ethics to empirical ethics to contextual ethics.从应用伦理学到实证伦理学到情境伦理学。
Bioethics. 2018 Feb;32(2):119-125. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12419. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
6
A theory of international bioethics: multiculturalism, postmodernism, and the bankruptcy of fundamentalism.一种国际生物伦理学理论:多元文化主义、后现代主义与原教旨主义的破产
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1998 Sep;8(3):201-31. doi: 10.1353/ken.1998.0017.
7
What makes a problem an ethical problem? An empirical perspective on the nature of ethical problems in general practice.是什么使得一个问题成为伦理问题?关于全科医疗中伦理问题本质的实证视角。
J Med Ethics. 2001 Apr;27(2):98-103. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.2.98.
8
Accounting for context: future directions in bioethics theory and research.考虑背景因素:生物伦理学理论与研究的未来方向
Theor Med. 1996 Jun;17(2):101-19. doi: 10.1007/BF00539734.
9
Ethics and maternity care: from principles to practice.伦理学与孕产妇护理:从原则到实践。
J Perinat Educ. 2009;18(1):1-3. doi: 10.1624/105812409X396165.
10
Ethical codes: between theory and health care practice.
Med Law. 2003;22(2):251-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to informed consent in obstetric care during childbirth from practitioner's perspective: a qualitative study.从从业者角度看分娩期产科护理中知情同意的障碍:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 19;15(6):e101591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101591.
2
Investigating Obstetric Violence in Ecuador: A Cross-Sectional Study Spanning the Last Several Years.厄瓜多尔产科暴力调查:一项涵盖过去数年的横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 26;12(15):1480. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12151480.
3
Consistency of Delivery Mode Increases Chinese Mothers' Maternal Satisfaction: The Effect of Perception of Support from Medical Staff and Mothers' Self-Efficacy.分娩方式一致性提高中国母亲的产妇满意度:医务人员支持感知和母亲自我效能的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 12;19(22):14904. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214904.
4
Why the Elective Caesarean Lottery is Ethically Impermissible.为什么选择性剖宫产“抽签”在伦理上是不允许的。
Health Care Anal. 2019 Dec;27(4):249-268. doi: 10.1007/s10728-019-00370-0.
5
Shall parent / patient wishes be fulfilled in any case? A series of 32 ethics consultations: from reproductive medicine to neonatology.在任何情况下都应满足父母/患者的意愿吗?一系列 32 次伦理咨询:从生殖医学到新生儿学。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jan 8;20(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0342-x.
6
Giving birth with epidural analgesia: the experience of first-time mothers.使用硬膜外镇痛分娩:初产妇的经历。
J Perinat Educ. 2012 Winter;21(1):24-35. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.21.1.24.
7
Persuasion: The Key to Changing Women's Ideas About Birth.劝说:改变女性生育观念的关键
J Perinat Educ. 2009 Fall;18(4):41-4. doi: 10.1624/105812409X474807.

本文引用的文献

1
The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.《贝尔蒙报告》。保护人类研究受试者的伦理原则与准则。
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13.
2
Contemporary dilemmas in american childbirth education: findings from a comparative ethnographic study.美国分娩教育中的当代困境:一项比较人种志研究的结果
J Perinat Educ. 2007 Fall;16(4):25-37. doi: 10.1624/105812407X245614.
3
Perceived discrimination during prenatal care, labor, and delivery: an examination of data from the Oregon Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 1998-1999, 2000, and 2001.孕期保健、分娩过程中所感受到的歧视:对1998 - 1999年、2000年及2001年俄勒冈州妊娠风险评估监测系统数据的分析
Am J Public Health. 2008 Oct;98(10):1818-22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.123687. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
4
Marketing breastfeeding--reversing corporate influence on infant feeding practices.推广母乳喂养——扭转企业对婴儿喂养方式的影响
J Urban Health. 2008 Jul;85(4):486-504. doi: 10.1007/s11524-008-9279-6.
5
Factors affecting Latina immigrants' perceptions of maternal health care: findings from a qualitative study.影响拉丁裔移民对孕产妇保健认知的因素:一项定性研究的结果
Health Care Women Int. 2008 May;29(5):507-26. doi: 10.1080/07399330801949608.
6
Marketing infant formula through hospitals: the impact of commercial hospital discharge packs on breastfeeding.通过医院营销婴儿配方奶粉:商业性医院出院礼包对母乳喂养的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2008 Feb;98(2):290-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.103218. Epub 2008 Jan 2.
7
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 395. Surgery and patient choice.美国妇产科医师学会第395号委员会意见。手术与患者选择。
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;111(1):243-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000291581.16747.24.
8
Parental refusal of medical treatment for a newborn.父母拒绝为新生儿提供医疗救治。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2007;28(5):427-41. doi: 10.1007/s11017-007-9046-9.
9
Vulnerable and strong--lesbian women encountering maternity care.脆弱与坚强——女同性恋者的孕产护理经历
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Dec;60(5):478-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04439.x.
10
A review of issues surrounding medically elective cesarean delivery.关于医学选择性剖宫产相关问题的综述。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2007 Nov-Dec;36(6):605-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00196.x.

分娩伦理学:母亲、家庭、分娩教育者、护士和医生应了解的分娩伦理知识。

Birthing ethics: what mothers, families, childbirth educators, nurses, and physicians should know about the ethics of childbirth.

作者信息

Torres Jennifer M, De Vries Raymond G

机构信息

JENNIFER TORRES is a doctoral student in the Sociology Department at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor . RAYMOND DE VRIES is a member of the Bioethics Program and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Michigan.

出版信息

J Perinat Educ. 2009;18(1):12-24. doi: 10.1624/105812409X396192.

DOI:10.1624/105812409X396192
PMID:19360141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2667293/
Abstract

This article discusses current ethical issues associated with childbirth in the United States. It provides a review of moral problems and ethical choices made by parents and health-care professionals during the prenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum periods. Ethical issues are identified and framed through a "naturalized bioethics" approach, as recommended by Margaret Walker and her colleagues, Hilde Lindemann and Marian Verkerk. This approach critiques traditional bioethics and gives attention to everyday ethics and the social, economic, and political context within which ethical problems exist. This approach provides the reader with the tools needed to critically assess the way ethical problems are defined and resolved.

摘要

本文讨论了美国目前与分娩相关的伦理问题。它回顾了父母和医疗保健专业人员在产前、产时和产后阶段所面临的道德问题和伦理选择。按照玛格丽特·沃克及其同事希尔德·林德曼和玛丽安·费尔克的建议,通过“自然化生物伦理学”方法来识别和阐述伦理问题。这种方法对传统生物伦理学提出批评,并关注日常伦理以及伦理问题所存在的社会、经济和政治背景。这种方法为读者提供了批判性评估伦理问题的定义和解决方式所需的工具。