Campos-Candel Andreu, Llobat-Estellés Maria, Mauri-Aucejo Adela
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Universitat de València, Dr. Moliner 50, Burjassot, València E-46100, Spain.
Talanta. 2009 Jun 15;78(4-5):1286-92. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2009.01.055. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
An HPLC method for the determination of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and o-xylene, m-xylene and p-xylene in occupational environments was developed and compared with a GC-MS method. Chromatographic analysis using a beta-cyclodextrin stationary phase was performed after active and passive air sampling by adsorption on activated charcoal and pressurized fluid extraction. The analytes were completely separated and quantified using both methods, although GC-MS provided better resolutions and lower detection limits than HPLC. The HPLC method was unsuccessfully applied to the determination of benzene in real samples because its sensitivity was too low. Both methods were applied to the analysis of certified reference materials and air samples collected in several workplaces. Statistical comparison showed that HPLC and GC-MS provided analogous accuracy.
建立了一种用于测定职业环境中苯、甲苯、乙苯、邻二甲苯、间二甲苯和对二甲苯的高效液相色谱法,并与气相色谱-质谱联用(GC-MS)法进行了比较。通过活性炭吸附进行主动和被动空气采样以及加压流体萃取后,使用β-环糊精固定相进行色谱分析。两种方法都能对分析物进行完全分离和定量,不过GC-MS的分离度更好,检测限比高效液相色谱法更低。高效液相色谱法由于灵敏度太低,未能成功应用于实际样品中苯的测定。两种方法都应用于有证标准物质的分析以及在多个工作场所采集的空气样品的分析。统计比较表明,高效液相色谱法和GC-MS法的准确度相近。