Suppr超能文献

老年抑郁量表简表的拉施分析

Rasch analysis of the Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form.

作者信息

Chiang Karl S, Green Kathy E, Cox Enid O

机构信息

University of Denver, Counseling Psychology Program, Denver, CO 80208, USA.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2009 Apr;49(2):262-75. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp018. Epub 2009 Mar 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine scale dimensionality, reliability, invariance, targeting, continuity, cutoff scores, and diagnostic use of the Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form (GDS-SF) over time with a sample of 177 English-speaking U.S. elders.

DESIGN AND METHODS

An item response theory, Rasch analysis, was conducted with data from a larger study that implemented 3 interventions and collected data at 3 time points (prior to intervention, after intervention, and a year following the end of intervention).

RESULTS

A unidimensional structure was found in this study to adequately fit the data. There appears to be significant differential item functioning, with up to one third of the items indicating that the items have different meanings for different groups of participants. As a screening tool, the GDS-SF is more likely to discriminate between older adults who have a "moderate" level of depression than between those with mild depression and no diagnosed depression.

IMPLICATIONS

We would recommend that the GDS-SF not be used as the sole method of screening for depression but incorporated into other clinical knowledge related to the geriatric patient in question, given that not all items are equally functional. The GDS-SF may be less effective as a screening tool but could be better used to detect a change in moderate levels of depression. Clinicians may also benefit by identifying person responses that misfit. If an individual provides responses that are atypical, the person might be referred to provide a more in-depth assessment of mental health status.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对老年抑郁量表简版(GDS-SF)的量表维度、信度、不变性、针对性、连续性、临界分数及诊断用途进行长期研究,样本为177名说英语的美国老年人。

设计与方法

采用项目反应理论中的拉施分析方法,对一项更大规模研究的数据进行分析。该研究实施了3种干预措施,并在3个时间点(干预前、干预后以及干预结束后一年)收集数据。

结果

本研究发现该量表具有单维结构,能较好地拟合数据。存在显著的项目功能差异,多达三分之一的项目表明这些项目对不同组别的参与者具有不同含义。作为一种筛查工具,GDS-SF更有可能区分出患有“中度”抑郁症的老年人,而不是区分轻度抑郁症患者和未被诊断出抑郁症的患者。

启示

鉴于并非所有项目都具有同等功能,我们建议不要将GDS-SF作为筛查抑郁症的唯一方法,而应将其纳入与相关老年患者有关的其他临床知识中。GDS-SF作为筛查工具可能效果较差,但可更好地用于检测中度抑郁症水平的变化。临床医生也可能会从识别不匹配的个体反应中受益。如果个体提供的反应不典型,则可能需要转介该个体进行更深入的心理健康状况评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验