Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Real-World Evidence, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Psychogeriatrics. 2024 Jul;24(4):909-914. doi: 10.1111/psyg.13146. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
Older adults with major depression are at risk of frailty and long-term care needs. Consequently, screening for major depression is imperative to prevent such risks. In Japan, the Late-Stage Elderly Questionnaire was developed to evaluate older adults' holistic health, including mental well-being. It comprises one specific question to gauge life satisfaction, but the effectiveness of this question to screen for major depression remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to assess the usability of this question to screen for major depression.
This retrospective cohort study used a large, commercially available claims database in Japan. Participants were older adults aged ≥75 years who completed the Late-Stage Elderly Questionnaire and were classified with and without new major depression within 1 year. We evaluated the questionnaire's ability to screen for major depression using C-statistics, developing three models to assess the cut-off value based on responses to the life satisfaction question ('Satisfied', 'Somewhat satisfied', 'Somewhat unsatisfied', or 'Unsatisfied'), estimating the sensitivity and specificity of each model.
Among 11 117 older adults, 77 newly experienced major depression within 1 year. The C-statistic for screening major depression was 0.587. The model setting the cut-off between 'Somewhat unsatisfied' and 'Unsatisfied' the demonstrated lowest sensitivity and highest specificity, while the model setting the cut-off between 'Satisfied' and 'Somewhat satisfied' demonstrated highest sensitivity and lowest specificity.
Our results suggest that due to its poor screening ability and high rate of false negatives, the question assessing life satisfaction in the Late-Stage Elderly Questionnaire may not be useful for screening major depression in older adults and may require modification.
患有重度抑郁症的老年人有衰弱和长期护理需求的风险。因此,筛查重度抑郁症对于预防这些风险至关重要。在日本,开发了晚期老年人问卷来评估老年人的整体健康状况,包括心理健康。它包括一个专门的问题来衡量生活满意度,但该问题筛查重度抑郁症的效果尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在评估该问题筛查重度抑郁症的可用性。
这是一项使用日本大型商业索赔数据库的回顾性队列研究。参与者为年龄≥75 岁的老年人,他们完成了晚期老年人问卷,并且在 1 年内被分类为患有或未患有新的重度抑郁症。我们使用 C 统计量评估问卷筛查重度抑郁症的能力,根据对生活满意度问题的回答(“满意”、“有些满意”、“有些不满意”或“不满意”)制定三个模型来评估截断值,估计每个模型的敏感性和特异性。
在 11117 名老年人中,77 人在 1 年内新出现重度抑郁症。筛查重度抑郁症的 C 统计量为 0.587。将“有些不满意”和“不满意”之间设为截断值的模型表现出最低的敏感性和最高的特异性,而将“满意”和“有些满意”之间设为截断值的模型表现出最高的敏感性和最低的特异性。
我们的研究结果表明,由于其筛查能力差且假阴性率高,评估晚期老年人问卷中生活满意度的问题可能不适用于筛查老年人的重度抑郁症,可能需要修改。