Suppr超能文献

医生对住院患者预防有症状静脉血栓栓塞的警示

Physician alerts to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients.

作者信息

Piazza Gregory, Rosenbaum Erin J, Pendergast William, Jacobson Joseph O, Pendleton Robert C, McLaren Gordon D, Elliott C Gregory, Stevens Scott M, Patton William F, Dabbagh Ousama, Paterno Marilyn D, Catapane Elaine, Li Zhongzhen, Goldhaber Samuel Z

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Circulation. 2009 Apr 28;119(16):2196-201. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.841197. Epub 2009 Apr 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis remains underused among hospitalized patients. We designed and carried out a large, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to test the hypothesis that an alert from a hospital staff member to the attending physician will reduce the rate of symptomatic VTE among high-risk patients not receiving prophylaxis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled patients using a validated point score system to detect hospitalized patients at high risk for symptomatic VTE who were not receiving prophylaxis. We randomized 2493 patients (82% on Medical Services) from 25 study sites to the intervention group (n=1238), in which the responsible physician was alerted by another hospital staff member, or the control group (n=1255), in which no alert was issued. The primary end point was symptomatic, objectively confirmed VTE within 90 days. Patients whose physicians were alerted were more than twice as likely to receive VTE prophylaxis as control subjects (46.0% versus 20.6%; P<0.0001). The symptomatic VTE rate was lower in the intervention group (2.7% versus 3.4%; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.25), but the difference did not achieve statistical significance. The rate of major bleeding at 30 days in the alert group was similar to that in the control group (2.1% versus 2.3%; P=0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

A strategy of direct notification of the physician by a staff member increases prophylaxis use and leads to a reduction in the rate of symptomatic VTE in hospitalized patients. However, VTE prophylaxis continues to be underused even after physician notification, especially among Medical Service patients.

摘要

背景

住院患者中静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的预防措施仍未得到充分应用。我们设计并开展了一项大型、多中心、随机对照试验,以检验以下假设:医院工作人员向主治医生发出警报将降低未接受预防措施的高危患者出现症状性VTE的发生率。

方法与结果

我们使用经过验证的积分系统纳入患者,以检测未接受预防措施但有症状性VTE高危风险的住院患者。我们将来自25个研究地点的2493例患者(82%在医疗科室)随机分为干预组(n = 1238),即由另一名医院工作人员向责任医生发出警报,以及对照组(n = 1255),即不发出警报。主要终点是90天内出现症状且经客观证实的VTE。医生收到警报的患者接受VTE预防措施的可能性是对照组患者的两倍多(46.0%对20.6%;P<0.0001)。干预组的症状性VTE发生率较低(2.7%对3.4%;风险比,0.79;95%CI,0.50至1.25),但差异未达到统计学显著性。警报组30天内的大出血发生率与对照组相似(2.1%对2.3%;P = 0.68)。

结论

工作人员直接通知医生的策略可增加预防措施的使用,并降低住院患者症状性VTE的发生率。然而,即使在通知医生后,VTE预防措施仍未得到充分应用,尤其是在医疗科室的患者中。

相似文献

1
Physician alerts to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients.
Circulation. 2009 Apr 28;119(16):2196-201. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.841197. Epub 2009 Apr 13.
2
Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 24;4(4):CD008201. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008201.pub3.
3
Electronic alerts for hospitalized high-VTE risk patients not receiving prophylaxis: a cohort study.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2008 Apr;25(2):146-50. doi: 10.1007/s11239-007-0081-1. Epub 2007 Nov 17.
5
Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):969-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041533.
6
Randomized trial of physician alerts for thromboprophylaxis after discharge.
Am J Med. 2013 May;126(5):435-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.09.020. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
10
Standard- versus extended-duration anticoagulation for primary venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 4;12(12):CD014541. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014541.pub2.

引用本文的文献

2
A dynamic customized electronic health record rule based clinical decision support tool for standardized adult intensive care metrics.
JAMIA Open. 2024 Dec 11;7(4):ooae143. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae143. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Universal EHRs Clinical Decision Support for Thromboprophylaxis in Medical Inpatients: A Cluster Randomized Trial.
JACC Adv. 2023 Sep 13;2(8):100597. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100597. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
The Use of Risk Scores for Thromboprophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients-Rationale and Design of the RICO trial.
TH Open. 2024 Jan 12;8(1):e55-e60. doi: 10.1055/a-2209-4708. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
The effect of information technology intervention on using appropriate VTE prophylaxis in non-surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Digit Health. 2022 Aug 17;8:20552076221118828. doi: 10.1177/20552076221118828. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
7
Electronic alerts to initiate anticoagulation dialogue in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Am Heart J. 2022 Mar;245:29-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.11.008. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
8
Protocol implementation for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: a before-and-after study in medical and surgical patients.
J Bras Pneumol. 2020 Mar 20;46(4):e20180325. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20180325. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

2
Deep-vein thrombosis in the elderly.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2008 Oct;14(4):393-8. doi: 10.1177/1076029608317942. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
5
Electronic alerts for hospitalized high-VTE risk patients not receiving prophylaxis: a cohort study.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2008 Apr;25(2):146-50. doi: 10.1007/s11239-007-0081-1. Epub 2007 Nov 17.
6
Thromboprophylaxis rates in US medical centers: success or failure?
J Thromb Haemost. 2007 Aug;5(8):1610-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02650.x.
10
Clinical practice. Prophylaxis for thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients.
N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 5;356(14):1438-44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp067264.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验