Banks Pauline, Martin Colin R
School of Health Studies, University of the West of Scotland, Ayr, UK.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Jun;15(3):460-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01036.x. Epub 2009 Apr 2.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The concept of quality of life (QoL) has emerged as an important psychological dimension in individuals experiencing Parkinson's disease (PD). The current study sought to determine the factor structure of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36) version 2 in patients with PD in order to evaluate how this measure might best be used to assess QoL in this clinical population.
Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on self-report SF-36 data from 339 individuals diagnosed with PD. Six structural models of the SF-36 were evaluated against the participants' data.
The underlying factor structure of the SF-36 in PD was observed to be inconsistent with the assumed measurement model of SF-36 but consistent with contemporary theoretical models of the instrument.
The use of the SF-36 in individuals with PD can be recommended when eight subscales are used and reported. Evidence to support the use of the instrument as a two-subscale measure of physical health and mental health components was not found.
原理、目的和目标:生活质量(QoL)的概念已成为帕金森病(PD)患者重要的心理维度。本研究旨在确定帕金森病患者中医疗结局研究简表36(SF-36)第2版的因子结构,以评估该测量方法如何最好地用于评估这一临床人群的生活质量。
对339名被诊断为帕金森病的个体的自我报告SF-36数据进行验证性因子分析。根据参与者的数据评估了SF-36的六种结构模型。
观察到帕金森病患者中SF-36的潜在因子结构与SF-36假定的测量模型不一致,但与该工具的当代理论模型一致。
当使用并报告八个分量表时,可推荐在帕金森病个体中使用SF-36。未发现支持将该工具用作身体健康和心理健康成分的两分量表测量方法的证据。