Müllegger R R, Glatz M
Curr Probl Dermatol. 2009;37:178-182. doi: 10.1159/000213075. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
Serologic follow-up examinations are frequently performed in patients with erythema migrans, borrelial lymphocytoma, and acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans (the 3 dermatoborrelioses) to evaluate treatment efficacy. There is, however, substantial proof in the literature that antibody titer development after therapy is unpredictable and variable, and moreover it is largely uncorrelated with the clinical course and mode of antibiotic treatment. For example, persistent positive IgG and/ or IgM antibody titers do not indicate treatment failure. Thus, repeated serologic testing is of very limited value for assessing therapy efficacy, and therefore not recommended in the follow-up of dermatoborrelioses patients. Since cultivation of the etiologic agent, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, and polymerase chain reaction are also inadequate for this purpose, the assessment of patients with cutaneous manifestations of Lyme borreliosis in the follow-up rests primarily on the clinical picture.
对于游走性红斑、疏螺旋体淋巴细胞瘤和慢性萎缩性肢端皮炎(三种皮肤疏螺旋体病)患者,常进行血清学随访检查以评估治疗效果。然而,文献中有大量证据表明,治疗后抗体滴度的变化是不可预测且多变的,而且在很大程度上与临床病程和抗生素治疗方式无关。例如,持续的IgG和/或IgM抗体滴度阳性并不表明治疗失败。因此,重复进行血清学检测对评估治疗效果的价值非常有限,故不建议在皮肤疏螺旋体病患者的随访中进行。由于病原体伯氏疏螺旋体狭义种的培养以及聚合酶链反应在此方面也不适用,莱姆病疏螺旋体病皮肤表现患者随访中的评估主要基于临床表现。