Suppr超能文献

患有静脉疾病的患者可从手法淋巴引流中获益。

Patients with venous disease benefit from manual lymphatic drainage.

作者信息

Molski P, Ossowski R, Hagner W, Molski S

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Poland.

出版信息

Int Angiol. 2009 Apr;28(2):151-5.

Abstract

AIM

Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD) may increase the quality of life (QoL) of patients with chronic venous disorder (CVD). The aim of the study was to determine the effect of MLD in patients with CVD who were candidates for venous surgery.

METHODS

Patients with CVD selected for elective venous surgery were randomly divided into 2 groups (N.=20). In the preoperative period, patients in the MLD group underwent MLD 3 times a week for 5 weeks. Patients in the control group did not undergo MLD. Both groups were evaluated for CVD staging on the day of selection for surgery and again 25 days after surgery. CVD staging was evaluated by: HADs (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale), CEAP classification and Venous Reflux Index (VRI).

RESULTS

Mean parameter values in the MLD group (before treatment/after MLD/after surgery): Anxiety 12.85/8.85/4.95, Depression 9.40/6.30/3.00, VRI 0.39/0.25/0.17, CEAP 3.60/2.95/1.55. Parameter values in the control group (before treatment/after surgery): Anxiety 10.95/3.45, Depression 7.55/2.20, VRI 0.30/0.10, CEAP 3.55/1.80. In the MLD group there was improvement of QoL (P<0.05) and clinical stage according to the CEAP scale (P<0.05), and VRI (P<0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

After surgery, the MLD group had significantly better results than the control group in CEAP score (P<0.05) and had comparable results for QoL. MLD improved (P<0.05) VRI, CEAP score, anxiety and depression states. MLD can be an alternative or a supplementary procedure for patients surgically treated.

摘要

目的

手法淋巴引流(MLD)可能会提高慢性静脉疾病(CVD)患者的生活质量(QoL)。本研究的目的是确定MLD对拟行静脉手术的CVD患者的影响。

方法

选择择期静脉手术的CVD患者随机分为2组(N = 20)。术前,MLD组患者每周接受3次MLD,共5周。对照组患者未接受MLD。两组在手术入选当天和术后25天再次进行CVD分期评估。通过医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADs)、CEAP分类和静脉反流指数(VRI)评估CVD分期。

结果

MLD组的平均参数值(治疗前/MLD后/术后):焦虑12.85/8.85/4.95,抑郁9.40/6.30/3.00,VRI 0.39/0.25/0.17,CEAP 3.60/2.95/1.55。对照组的参数值(治疗前/术后):焦虑10.95/3.45,抑郁7.55/2.20,VRI 0.30/0.10,CEAP 3.55/1.80。MLD组的生活质量有所改善(P<0.05),根据CEAP量表的临床分期有所改善(P<0.05),VRI也有所改善(P<0.03)。

结论

术后,MLD组在CEAP评分方面的结果明显优于对照组(P<0.05),生活质量结果相当。MLD改善了(P<0.05)VRI、CEAP评分、焦虑和抑郁状态。对于接受手术治疗的患者,MLD可以作为一种替代或补充治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验