Suppr超能文献

[急性心肌梗死后早期筛选高危患者时铊与双嘧达莫负荷超声心动图检查。哪种检查?何种剂量?]

[Thallium and echo- dipyridamole in the early selection of patients at risk after acute myocardial infarction. Which test? What dose?].

作者信息

Casanova R, Fabbri M, Patroncini A, Jacopi F, Pirazzini L, Varani E, Maresta A

机构信息

Servizio di Cardiologia Ospedale Per Gli Infermi, Faenza.

出版信息

G Ital Cardiol. 1991 Apr;21(4):377-86.

PMID:1936742
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The optimal iv dose of Dipyridamole (Dip) in echocardiography (echo) or Thallium scintigraphy (Tl) remains undetermined. To select the high-risk patients (pts) subset, we performed echo and Tl with standard dose (SD) and high dose (HD) Dip infusion (0.56 mg/Kg/4'-0.84 mg/Kg/10' respectively) in 40 pts 9 +/- 3 days after admission for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Of these, 38 pts had coronary artery disease at angiography and 2 had no significant lesions. Worsening in regional wall motion on echo and reversible perfusion defects on Tl were considered abnormal patterns. SD had no side effects; only in one pt was ischemic ventricular dysfunction detected on echo, whereas Tl redistribution was found in 24 pts (12 had multivessel disease and 12 had one coronary stenosis greater than or equal to 70%). HD caused adverse reaction in 24 pts, did not enhance SD-Tl sensitivity, but induced abnormal echo in 18/24 pts with transient defects on SD-Tl. Eleven of the 16 Tl negative pts had occlusive disease, 3 had one vessel disease and 2 showed no evidence of coronary artery disease.

IN CONCLUSION

SD is safe but often provokes a submaximal coronary vasodilation. Failure to detect ischemia on echo may be explained by this. SD-Tl is, however, able to identify high-risk pts who may benefit from early myocardial revascularization. HD does not enhance SD-Tl sensitivity, but it is necessary to induce echo abnormalities which are all too often undetectable at SD.

摘要

未标注

双嘧达莫(Dip)在超声心动图(echo)或铊闪烁扫描(Tl)检查中的最佳静脉注射剂量尚未确定。为了选择高危患者亚组,我们在40例急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者入院9±3天后,分别以标准剂量(SD)和高剂量(HD)静脉输注双嘧达莫(分别为0.56mg/kg/4分钟 - 0.84mg/kg/10分钟)进行了超声心动图和铊闪烁扫描检查。其中,38例患者在血管造影时患有冠状动脉疾病,2例无明显病变。超声心动图上局部室壁运动恶化和铊闪烁扫描上可逆性灌注缺损被视为异常模式。标准剂量无副作用;仅1例患者在超声心动图上检测到缺血性心室功能障碍,而24例患者(12例患有多支血管病变,12例有一支冠状动脉狭窄≥70%)出现铊再分布。高剂量导致24例患者出现不良反应,未提高标准剂量 - 铊闪烁扫描的敏感性,但在24例标准剂量 - 铊闪烁扫描有短暂缺损的患者中,有18例出现异常超声心动图表现。16例铊闪烁扫描阴性患者中,11例有闭塞性疾病,3例有单支血管病变,2例未显示冠状动脉疾病证据。

结论

标准剂量安全,但常引起次最大程度的冠状动脉血管扩张。超声心动图未能检测到缺血可能由此解释。然而,标准剂量 - 铊闪烁扫描能够识别可能从早期心肌血运重建中获益的高危患者。高剂量未提高标准剂量 - 铊闪烁扫描的敏感性,但对于诱发超声心动图异常是必要的,而这些异常在标准剂量时常常无法检测到。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验