Petretta M, Canonico V, Bianchi V, Attisano T, Arrichiello P, Morgano G, Capozzi E, Bonaduce D
Istituto di Medicina Interna, Cardiologia e Cardiochirurgia, IIa Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia dell'Università Degli Studi di Napoli.
G Ital Cardiol. 1991 Apr;21(4):395-408.
Elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have a higher subsequent mortality than younger ones, yet the reasons for this adverse prognosis are poorly understood. We compared the clinical course and the prognosis of 163 patients aged 40 to 69 years with 112 patients older than 70 years. During hospitalization period 15.9% of younger and 37.5% of older patients died; at 1 year follow-up the cardiac mortality rate was 8.7% in younger and 12.9% in older patients. In elderly patients a greater prevalence of female gender, diabetes mellitus, anterior myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation and a greater incidence of heart failure and shock were observed. Multivariate stepwise analysis identified shock and heart rate greater than or equal to 90 bpm at the time of admission as the most important prognostic variables for in-hospital mortality in both groups; heart failure (Killip class II and III) was significant in younger patients, while non Q wave myocardial infarction correlated with a better prognosis in elderly. In elderly patients who survived AMI, predischarge Holter monitoring showed higher frequency and complexity of ventricular arrhythmias, and radionuclide angiography lower left ventricular ejection fraction (E.F.) values. In these patients no difference was found in E.F. values despite myocardial infarction sites. At 1 year follow-up E.F. less than 40% and ventricular arrhythmias (3-4 Moss grading system) were significantly related to prognosis in younger patients, while E.F. less than 40% and clinical signs of heart failure in elderly. Therefore, low E.F. and heart failure account for a worse prognosis in elderly patients, while ventricular arrhythmias in younger ones. The results of this study support aggressive management even in elderly patients following AMI to preserve left ventricular function. In elderly patients a large use of antiarrhythmic drugs is not recommended because of low prognostic value of ventricular arrhythmias.
老年急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的后续死亡率高于年轻患者,然而导致这种不良预后的原因却知之甚少。我们比较了163例年龄在40至69岁之间的患者与112例年龄大于70岁患者的临床病程及预后。在住院期间,年轻患者的死亡率为15.9%,老年患者为37.5%;在1年随访时,年轻患者的心脏死亡率为8.7%,老年患者为12.9%。在老年患者中,女性、糖尿病、前壁心肌梗死、心房颤动的患病率更高,心力衰竭和休克的发生率也更高。多因素逐步分析确定,休克和入院时心率大于或等于90次/分钟是两组患者院内死亡最重要的预后变量;心力衰竭(Killip分级II级和III级)在年轻患者中具有显著意义,而非Q波心肌梗死与老年患者较好的预后相关。在AMI存活的老年患者中,出院前动态心电图监测显示室性心律失常的频率和复杂性更高,放射性核素血管造影显示左心室射血分数(E.F.)值更低。在这些患者中,尽管心肌梗死部位不同,但E.F.值并无差异。在1年随访时,E.F.小于40%和室性心律失常(3 - 4级Moss分级系统)与年轻患者的预后显著相关,而E.F.小于40%和心力衰竭的临床体征与老年患者的预后相关。因此,低E.F.和心力衰竭导致老年患者预后较差,而室性心律失常导致年轻患者预后较差。本研究结果支持即使在老年AMI患者中也应积极治疗以保留左心室功能。由于室性心律失常的预后价值较低,不建议在老年患者中大量使用抗心律失常药物。