Berisso M Z, Ferroni A, Molini D, Vecchio C
Divisione di Cardiologia, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genova.
G Ital Cardiol. 1991 Jan;21(1):49-58.
Clinical significance, short and long-term prognostic value, and treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias were evaluated in 208 patients with definite acute myocardial infarction (AMI). No patient received thrombolytic therapy. In Coronary Care Unit supraventricular tachyarrhythmias were detected by continuous electrocardiographic monitoring in 30 (14%) patients: 18 had atrial fibrillation, 1 atrial flutter, 9 paroxysmal atrial tachycardia and 2 non-paroxysmal junctional tachycardia. These episodes began within the first 48 hours of AMI in 93% of patients, and generally they were preceded by frequent or repetitive atrial premature beats. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias were significantly associated with older age, higher incidence of overt left ventricular dysfunction (both p less than 0.05) and higher Peel Index (p less than 0.02). They caused severe hemodynamic consequences in 20% of patients. In 8 patients they were selflimiting, in 20 they were suppressed by means of medical therapy and in one by DC countershock. During hospitalization supraventricular tachyarrhythmias recurred in one patient; moreover, in this period cardiac death occurred in 26% of patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias and in 13% of the remaining (p: ns). Multivariate analysis showed that supraventricular tachyarrhythmias are not important factors in identifying patients at risk of cardiac death. At hospital discharge, patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias showed significantly higher values of left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions (both less than 0.05), and a greater use of digitalis-diuretics and/or vasodilators (p less than 0.03). By contrast, in patients with and without supraventricular tachyarrhythmias no significant difference was present with regard to the frequency of New York Heart Association functional classes III-IV for congestive heart failure, frequency of significant tachyarrhythmic events during 24-hour continuous electrocardiographic recording, X-ray cardiac size and left ventricular ejection fraction at rest. In the 2 years following AMI, survival curves showed no significant difference in the risk of cardiac death among patients with or without supraventricular tachyarrhythmias; in particular, in the first group only 2 patients had severe hemodynamic events and no patient showed recurrences of tachyarrhythmia. Our findings suggest that although supraventricular tachyarrhythmias complicating AMI frequently occur in patients with severe cardiac disease they are not related to a higher risk of cardiac death either during in-hospital period or in the 2 years following AMI; medical therapy is effective and safe to suppress these arrhythmias; a systematic use of specific antiarrhythmic drugs to prevent their recurrences is not necessary.
对208例确诊为急性心肌梗死(AMI)的患者评估了室上性快速心律失常的临床意义、短期和长期预后价值及治疗情况。所有患者均未接受溶栓治疗。在冠心病监护病房,通过连续心电图监测在30例(14%)患者中检测到室上性快速心律失常:18例为心房颤动,1例为心房扑动,9例为阵发性房性心动过速,2例为非阵发性交界性心动过速。这些发作在93%的患者中于AMI的最初48小时内开始,且通常在频繁或反复的房性早搏之前出现。室上性快速心律失常与高龄、明显左心室功能障碍的较高发生率(均p<0.05)及较高的皮尔指数(p<0.02)显著相关。它们在20%的患者中导致了严重的血流动力学后果。8例患者的心律失常为自限性,20例通过药物治疗得以控制,1例通过直流电复律。住院期间,1例患者室上性快速心律失常复发;此外,在此期间,室上性快速心律失常患者的心脏死亡率为26%,其余患者为13%(p:无显著性差异)。多因素分析表明,室上性快速心律失常并非识别心脏死亡风险患者的重要因素。出院时,室上性快速心律失常患者的左心室舒张末期和收缩末期内径值显著更高(均<0.05),且洋地黄 - 利尿剂和/或血管扩张剂的使用频率更高(p<0.03)。相比之下,在有和没有室上性快速心律失常的患者中,纽约心脏协会充血性心力衰竭III - IV级功能分级的频率、24小时连续心电图记录期间显著快速心律失常事件的频率、X线心脏大小及静息时左心室射血分数方面均无显著差异。在AMI后的2年中,生存曲线显示有或无室上性快速心律失常的患者在心脏死亡风险方面无显著差异;特别是,在第一组中只有2例患者发生严重血流动力学事件,且无患者出现快速心律失常复发。我们的研究结果表明,尽管并发AMI的室上性快速心律失常在严重心脏病患者中经常发生,但它们在住院期间或AMI后的2年中均与较高的心脏死亡风险无关;药物治疗抑制这些心律失常有效且安全;无需系统性使用特定抗心律失常药物来预防其复发。