Ertl G, Gaudron P, Eilles C, Kochsiek K
Medizinische Klinik, Universität Würzburg.
Herz. 1993 Dec;18 Suppl 1:406-15.
The incidence of coronary heart disease and myocardial infarction fell gradually during the seventies. Reasons for this decline are not well understood. Speculations include changes of life style and health care. However, cardiovascular disease is still the leader of mortality in Western developed countries. Mortality of myocardial infarction has also declined. The major benefit was associated with broad establishment of coronary care units, smaller steps were achieved by various progresses in medical treatment. In contrast, the incidence of heart failure has increased. The major etiology of heart failure nowadays is coronary heart disease, especially large or recurrent myocardial infarction. The incidence of heart failure in patients having recovered from myocardial infarction is dramatically higher than in normal population. The Framingham Study showed an incidence of 14% in five years following a myocardial infarction. Prognosis of patients with manifestation of symptoms of heart failure is very poor. Patients with heart failure had an overall six years mortality of 55%. These observations suggest that coronary care units, thrombolysis and modern treatment as developed so far, suppressed in-hospital mortality and improved survival for the first year after a myocardial infarction. Thus, patients with larger infarcts who had succumbed early under previous regimens, survived. They carry, however, the burden of severely impaired left ventricular function, high probability to develop heart failure, and of a dubious long-term prognosis. Large efforts have put upon development of scores to estimate long-term prognosis after a myocardial infarction. With the development of techniques, composition of scores changed. However, residual ischemia, major left ventricular dysfunction, and ventricular arrhythmias are the basis of most scores indicating an adverse prognosis after an infarction. This review will be limited to the prognostic impact of left ventricular dysfunction and development of heart failure post myocardial infarction. A hypothetic cascade of events which may lead from myocardial infarction to heart failure and death is schematically outlined in Figure 1. Loss of contractile myocardium results in left ventricular dysfunction which may induce dilatation of the left ventricle, heart failure and ultimately death. This paper focuses on the evidence for the prognostic impact of the single steps and the whole cascade. Figure 1 shows in parenthesis the variables which were frequently measured to assess loss of contractile tissue, left ventricular dysfunction, and dilatation. Since heart failure is understood as a clinical syndrome of symptoms, it may only be semi-quantitated according to the classification of the New York Heart Association (NYHA).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
冠心病和心肌梗死的发病率在20世纪70年代逐渐下降。这种下降的原因尚不完全清楚。推测包括生活方式和医疗保健的变化。然而,心血管疾病仍然是西方发达国家的主要死因。心肌梗死的死亡率也有所下降。主要益处与冠心病监护病房的广泛设立有关,医疗治疗的各种进展取得的成效较小。相比之下,心力衰竭的发病率有所上升。如今,心力衰竭的主要病因是冠心病,尤其是大面积或复发性心肌梗死。心肌梗死后康复患者的心力衰竭发病率明显高于正常人群。弗明汉姆研究表明,心肌梗死后五年内的发病率为14%。出现心力衰竭症状的患者预后很差。心力衰竭患者的总体六年死亡率为55%。这些观察结果表明,冠心病监护病房、溶栓治疗和目前所采用的现代治疗方法降低了住院死亡率,并改善了心肌梗死后第一年的生存率。因此,那些在以前的治疗方案下早期死亡的大面积梗死患者存活了下来。然而,他们承受着左心室功能严重受损、发生心力衰竭的高概率以及不确定的长期预后的负担。人们已经做出了巨大努力来开发评估心肌梗死后长期预后的评分系统。随着技术的发展,评分系统的组成也发生了变化。然而,残余缺血、严重的左心室功能障碍和室性心律失常是大多数表明梗死后不良预后的评分系统的基础。本综述将限于左心室功能障碍对预后的影响以及心肌梗死后心力衰竭的发展。图1示意性地概述了一个可能从心肌梗死导致心力衰竭和死亡的假设性事件级联。收缩性心肌的丧失导致左心室功能障碍,这可能导致左心室扩张、心力衰竭并最终导致死亡。本文重点关注单个步骤和整个级联对预后影响的证据。图1括号中显示了常用于评估收缩性组织丧失、左心室功能障碍和扩张的变量。由于心力衰竭被理解为一种有症状的临床综合征,根据纽约心脏协会(NYHA)的分类,它可能只能进行半定量。(摘要截选至400字)