Norfleet R G, Ryan M E, Wyman J B, Rhodes R A, Nunez J F, Kirchner J P, Parent K
Department of Gastroenterology, Marshfield Medical Center, Wisconsin 54449.
Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 Sep-Oct;37(5):531-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70822-5.
This prospective study compares the accuracy of barium enema examination performed by experienced radiologists to colonoscopy performed by experienced gastroenterologists blinded to the radiographic findings to detect proximal, synchronous lesions in patients with polyps detected during fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy. Three thousand six patients were examined, of whom 147 (5%) had polyps larger than 0.5 cm in diameter. Of 114 patients who completed the protocol, 46 patients (40%) had synchronous, proximal colonic lesions. There were no radiographic false positives, but the single-contrast barium enema missed polyps in 13 while detecting polyps in 2 patients (sensitivity = 13%). The double-contrast barium enema missed proximal polyps in 23 patients while detecting them in 8 (sensitivity = 26%). We conclude that patients with neoplastic polyps found during fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy should have colonoscopy without barium enema. If the entire colon cannot be examined at colonoscopy, we advise double-contrast barium enema.
这项前瞻性研究比较了经验丰富的放射科医生进行的钡剂灌肠检查与经验丰富的胃肠病学家进行的结肠镜检查(对放射学检查结果不知情)在检测纤维乙状结肠镜检查中发现息肉的患者近端同步病变方面的准确性。对3600例患者进行了检查,其中147例(5%)有直径大于0.5厘米的息肉。在完成方案的114例患者中,46例(40%)有同步近端结肠病变。没有放射学假阳性,但单对比钡剂灌肠漏诊了13例息肉,仅检测到2例息肉(敏感性 = 13%)。双对比钡剂灌肠漏诊了23例近端息肉,仅检测到8例(敏感性 = 26%)。我们得出结论,在纤维乙状结肠镜检查中发现肿瘤性息肉的患者应进行结肠镜检查而非钡剂灌肠检查。如果结肠镜检查无法检查整个结肠,我们建议采用双对比钡剂灌肠检查。