Ott D J, Chen Y M, Gelfand D W, Wu W C, Munitz H A
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 May;146(5):993-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.146.5.993.
Radiographic and colonoscopic correlation in 139 patients with 234 colonic polyps compared the sensitivity of single- and double-contrast barium enema. Single-contrast barium enema detected 68 (80%) of polyps, with 72% of polyps under 1 cm and 94% of those 1 cm or over detected. Double-contrast barium enema detected 135 (91%) of 149 polyps, with 88% of polyps under 1 cm and 96% of larger polyps detected. Thus, the double-contrast barium enema was more effective than the single-contrast examination only for detection of polyps under 1 cm. The single-contrast barium enema was more likely performed on patients in poor physical condition and in those over 70 years old. The results suggest that for elderly patients, who may have difficulty in cooperating for a double-contrast enema, a properly performed single-contrast examination is an acceptable option.
对139例患有234个结肠息肉的患者进行了放射影像学与结肠镜检查的相关性研究,比较了单对比和双对比钡剂灌肠的敏感性。单对比钡剂灌肠检测出68个(80%)息肉,其中1厘米以下的息肉检测出72%,1厘米及以上的息肉检测出94%。双对比钡剂灌肠检测出149个息肉中的135个(91%),1厘米以下的息肉检测出88%,较大息肉检测出96%。因此,双对比钡剂灌肠仅在检测1厘米以下息肉方面比单对比检查更有效。单对比钡剂灌肠更常用于身体状况较差的患者以及70岁以上的患者。结果表明,对于可能难以配合进行双对比灌肠的老年患者,正确实施的单对比检查是一个可接受的选择。