Rougé Carole, Piloquet Hugues, Butel Marie-José, Berger Bernard, Rochat Florence, Ferraris Laurent, Des Robert Clotilde, Legrand Arnaud, de la Cochetière Marie-France, N'Guyen Jean-Michel, Vodovar Michel, Voyer Marcel, Darmaun Dominique, Rozé Jean-Christophe
INRA UMR 1280, Physiologie des Adaptations Nutritionnelles, INRA and University of Nantes, Human Nutrition Research Center, Nantes, France.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Jun;89(6):1828-35. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26919. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
BACKGROUND: Although recent reports suggest that supplementation with probiotics may enhance intestinal function in premature infants, the mechanisms are unclear, and questions remain regarding the safety and efficacy of probiotics in extremely low-birth-weight infants. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics on the digestive tolerance to enteral feeding in preterm infants born with a very low or extremely low birth weight. DESIGN: In a bicentric, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial that was stratified for center and birth weight, 45 infants received enteral probiotics (Bifidobacterium longum BB536 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG; BB536-LGG) and 49 received placebo. The primary endpoint was the percentage of infants receiving >50% of their nutritional needs via enteral feeding on the 14th day of life. A triangular test was used to perform sequential analysis. RESULTS: The trial was discontinued after the fourth sequential analysis concluded a lack of effect. The primary endpoint was not significantly different between the probiotic (57.8%) and placebo (57.1%) groups (P = 0.95). However, in infants who weighed >1000 g, probiotic supplementation was associated with a shortening in the time to reach full enteral feeding (P = 0.04). Other than colonization by the probiotic strains, no alteration in the composition of intestinal microbiota or changes in the fecal excretion of calprotectin was observed. No colonization by probiotic strains was detected in infants who weighed < or =1000 g, presumably because of more frequent suspensions of enteral feeding, more courses of antibiotic treatment, or both. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation with BB536-LGG may not improve the gastrointestinal tolerance to enteral feeding in very-low-birth-weight infants but may improve gastrointestinal tolerance in infants weighing >1000 g. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT 00290576.
背景:尽管近期报告表明补充益生菌可能增强早产儿的肠道功能,但其机制尚不清楚,且关于益生菌在极低出生体重儿中的安全性和有效性仍存在疑问。 目的:评估益生菌对极低或超低出生体重早产儿肠内喂养消化耐受性的疗效。 设计:在一项双中心、双盲、随机对照临床试验中,根据中心和出生体重进行分层,45例婴儿接受肠内益生菌(长双歧杆菌BB536和鼠李糖乳杆菌GG;BB536-LGG),49例接受安慰剂。主要终点是在出生后第14天通过肠内喂养满足>50%营养需求的婴儿百分比。采用三角检验进行序贯分析。 结果:在第四次序贯分析得出无效结论后,该试验停止。益生菌组(57.8%)和安慰剂组(57.1%)的主要终点无显著差异(P = 0.95)。然而,在体重>1000 g的婴儿中,补充益生菌与达到完全肠内喂养的时间缩短有关(P = 0.04)。除了益生菌菌株的定植外,未观察到肠道微生物群组成的改变或钙卫蛋白粪便排泄的变化。在体重≤1000 g的婴儿中未检测到益生菌菌株的定植,可能是因为肠内喂养更频繁中断、抗生素治疗疗程更多或两者兼而有之。 结论:补充BB536-LGG可能无法改善极低出生体重儿对肠内喂养的胃肠道耐受性,但可能改善体重>1000 g婴儿的胃肠道耐受性。该试验在clinicaltrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT 00290576。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-12-12
J Perinatol. 2011-5-5
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012-11-27
Pediatr Res. 2025-5-13
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-7-26