Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.
Bradford Neonatology, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 26;7(7):CD005496. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005496.pub6.
BACKGROUND: Intestinal dysbiosis may contribute to the pathogenesis of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) in very preterm or very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. Dietary supplementation with probiotics to modulate the intestinal microbiome has been proposed as a strategy to reduce the risk of NEC and associated mortality and morbidity in very preterm or VLBW infants. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of supplemental probiotics on the risk of NEC and associated mortality and morbidity in very preterm or very low birth weight infants. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, the Maternity and Infant Care database, and CINAHL from inception to July 2022. We searched clinical trials databases and conference proceedings, and examined the reference lists of retrieved articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing probiotics with placebo or no probiotics in very preterm infants (born before 32 weeks' gestation) and VLBW infants (weighing less than 1500 g at birth). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently evaluated risk of bias of the trials, extracted data, and synthesised effect estimates using risk ratios (RRs), risk differences (RDs), and mean differences (MDs), with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcomes were NEC and all-cause mortality; secondary outcome measures were late-onset invasive infection (more than 48 hours after birth), duration of hospitalisation from birth, and neurodevelopmental impairment. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included 60 trials with 11,156 infants. Most trials were small (median sample size 145 infants). The main potential sources of bias were unclear reporting of methods for concealing allocation and masking caregivers or investigators in about half of the trials. The formulation of the probiotics varied across trials. The most common preparations contained Bifidobacterium spp., Lactobacillus spp., Saccharomyces spp., andStreptococcus spp., alone or in combination. Very preterm or very low birth weight infants Probiotics may reduce the risk of NEC (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.65; I² = 17%; 57 trials, 10,918 infants; low certainty). The number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) was 33 (95% CI 25 to 50). Probiotics probably reduce mortality slightly (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.90; I² = 0%; 54 trials, 10,484 infants; moderate certainty); the NNTB was 50 (95% CI 50 to 100). Probiotics probably have little or no effect on the risk of late-onset invasive infection (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.97; I² = 22%; 49 trials, 9876 infants; moderate certainty). Probiotics may have little or no effect on neurodevelopmental impairment (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.26; I² = 0%; 5 trials, 1518 infants; low certainty). Extremely preterm or extremely low birth weight infants Few data were available for extremely preterm or extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. In this population, probiotics may have little or no effect on NEC (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.22, I² = 0%; 10 trials, 1836 infants; low certainty), all-cause mortality (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.18; I² = 0%; 7 trials, 1723 infants; low certainty), or late-onset invasive infection (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.09; I² = 0%; 7 trials, 1533 infants; low certainty). No trials provided data for measures of neurodevelopmental impairment in extremely preterm or ELBW infants. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Given the low to moderate certainty of evidence for the effects of probiotic supplements on the risk of NEC and associated morbidity and mortality for very preterm or VLBW infants, and particularly for extremely preterm or ELBW infants, there is a need for further large, high-quality trials to provide evidence of sufficient validity and applicability to inform policy and practice.
背景:肠道菌群失调可能导致极早产儿或极低出生体重儿(VLBW)发生坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)。通过补充益生菌来调节肠道微生物群,被认为是一种降低极早产儿或 VLBW 婴儿发生 NEC 及相关发病率和死亡率的策略。
目的:评估补充益生菌对极早产儿或极低出生体重儿发生 NEC 及相关发病率和死亡率的影响。
检索方法:我们检索了 CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、母婴护理数据库和 CINAHL,检索时间从建库至 2022 年 7 月。我们还检索了临床试验数据库和会议论文集,并查阅了检索到的文章的参考文献列表。
选择标准:我们纳入了比较益生菌与安慰剂或无益生菌在极早产儿(出生胎龄<32 周)和极低出生体重儿(出生体重<1500 g)中应用的随机对照试验(RCT)和准 RCT。
数据收集与分析:两名综述作者独立评估了试验的偏倚风险,提取数据,并使用风险比(RR)、风险差异(RD)和均数差(MD),以及相关的 95%置信区间(CI)来综合效应估计值。主要结局是 NEC 和全因死亡率;次要结局指标是晚发性侵袭性感染(出生后超过 48 小时)、从出生到住院的时间和神经发育损伤。我们使用 GRADE 方法评估证据的确定性。
主要结果:我们纳入了 60 项试验,共 11156 名婴儿。大多数试验规模较小(中位数样本量 145 名婴儿)。主要的潜在偏倚来源是约一半的试验在分配隐藏和干预者盲法方面的报告方法不明确。益生菌的配方在试验之间存在差异。最常见的制剂含有双歧杆菌属、乳杆菌属、酿酒酵母属和链球菌属,单独或联合使用。极早产儿或极低出生体重儿 益生菌可能降低 NEC 的风险(RR 0.54,95%CI 0.46 至 0.65;I² = 17%;57 项试验,10918 名婴儿;低确定性)。额外获益的需要治疗数(NNTB)为 33(95%CI 25 至 50)。益生菌可能会略微降低死亡率(RR 0.77,95%CI 0.66 至 0.90;I² = 0%;54 项试验,10484 名婴儿;中等确定性)。NNTB 为 50(95%CI 50 至 100)。益生菌可能对晚发性侵袭性感染的风险没有影响或影响很小(RR 0.89,95%CI 0.82 至 0.97;I² = 22%;49 项试验,9876 名婴儿;中等确定性)。益生菌对神经发育损伤的影响可能很小或没有(RR 1.03,95%CI 0.84 至 1.26;I² = 0%;5 项试验,1518 名婴儿;低确定性)。极早产儿或极低出生体重儿 对于极早产儿或极低出生体重儿(ELBW),数据很少。在这一人群中,益生菌对 NEC(RR 0.92,95%CI 0.69 至 1.22,I² = 0%;10 项试验,1836 名婴儿;低确定性)、全因死亡率(RR 0.92,95%CI 0.72 至 1.18;I² = 0%;7 项试验,1723 名婴儿;低确定性)或晚发性侵袭性感染(RR 0.93,95%CI 0.78 至 1.09;I² = 0%;7 项试验,1533 名婴儿;低确定性)的影响可能很小或没有。没有试验提供了极早产儿或 ELBW 婴儿神经发育损伤的措施数据。
结论:鉴于益生菌补充剂对极早产儿或 VLBW 婴儿发生 NEC 及相关发病率和死亡率的影响的证据的低至中等确定性,特别是对极早产儿或 ELBW 婴儿,需要进一步开展大型、高质量的试验,以提供足够有效和适用的证据,为政策和实践提供信息。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-7-26
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-3-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-6-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-8-30
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-8-24
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-1-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-10-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-12-15
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2025-6-5
J Clin Invest. 2025-6-2
Nat Microbiol. 2025-5-16
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2025-6
Int J Food Sci. 2025-4-14
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022-6-1
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022-7
Pediatrics. 2021-6
Acta Paediatr. 2021-2