Suppr超能文献

用于癌症治疗不良反应的顺势疗法药物。

Homeopathic medicines for adverse effects of cancer treatments.

作者信息

Kassab Sosie, Cummings Mike, Berkovitz Saul, van Haselen Robbert, Fisher Peter

机构信息

Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital, 60 Great Ormond Street, London, UK, WC1N 3HR.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD004845. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004845.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Homeopathic medicines are used by patients with cancer, often alongside conventional treatment. Cancer treatments can cause considerable morbidity and one of the reasons patients use homeopathic medicines is to help with adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate effectiveness and safety of homeopathic medicines used to prevent or treat adverse effects of cancer treatments.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The following were searched up to November 2008: Cochrane PaPaS Trials Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; EMBASE; CINAHL; BNI; CancerLIT; AMED; CISCOM; Hom-Inform; SIGLE; National Research Register; Zetoc; www.controlled-trials.com; http://clinicaltrials.gov; Liga Medicorum Homeopathica Internationalis (LMHI, Liga) conference proceedings; reference lists of relevant studies were checked; and homeopathic manufacturers, leading researchers and practitioners were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of homeopathic medicines in participants with a clinical or histological diagnosis of cancer where the intervention was aimed at preventing or treating symptoms associated with cancer treatments. All age groups, and all stages of disease were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and two review authors extracted data. Three review authors independently assessed trial quality using the Delphi List and the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Where available, data were extracted for analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight controlled trials (seven placebo controlled and one trial against an active treatment) with a total of 664 participants met the inclusion criteria. Three studied adverse effects of radiotherapy, three studied adverse effects of chemotherapy and two studied menopausal symptoms associated with breast cancer treatment.Two studies with low risk of bias demonstrated benefit: one with 254 participants demonstrated superiority of topical calendula over trolamine (a topical agent not containing corticosteroids) for prevention of radiotherapy-induced dermatitis, and another with 32 participants demonstrated superiority of Traumeel S (a proprietary complex homeopathic medicine) over placebo as a mouthwash for chemotherapy-induced stomatitis. Two other studies reported positive results, although the risk of bias was unclear, and four further studies reported negative results.No serious adverse effects or interactions were reported attributable to the homeopathic medicines used.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review found preliminary data in support of the efficacy of topical calendula for prophylaxis of acute dermatitis during radiotherapy and Traumeel S mouthwash in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced stomatitis. These trials need replicating. There is no convincing evidence for the efficacy of homeopathic medicines for other adverse effects of cancer treatments. Further research is required.

摘要

背景

癌症患者常使用顺势疗法药物,通常与传统治疗同时进行。癌症治疗可导致相当大的发病率,患者使用顺势疗法药物的原因之一是帮助应对不良反应。

目的

评估用于预防或治疗癌症治疗不良反应的顺势疗法药物的有效性和安全性。

检索策略

检索截至2008年11月的以下资源:Cochrane PaPaS试验注册库;Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL);医学索引(MEDLINE);医学文摘数据库(EMBASE);护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL);英国国家书目(BNI);癌症文献数据库(CancerLIT);另类医学数据库(AMED);顺势疗法信息数据库(CISCOM);顺势疗法信息数据库(Hom-Inform);灰色文献数据库(SIGLE);国家研究注册库;Zetoc;www.controlled-trials.com;http://clinicaltrials.gov;国际顺势疗法医学联盟(LMHI,Liga)会议论文集;检查相关研究的参考文献列表;并联系顺势疗法药物制造商、主要研究人员和从业者。

入选标准

对临床或组织学诊断为癌症的参与者进行顺势疗法药物的随机对照试验(RCT),干预措施旨在预防或治疗与癌症治疗相关的症状。纳入所有年龄组和疾病的所有阶段。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立评估研究是否纳入,两位综述作者提取数据。三位综述作者使用德尔菲列表和Cochrane协作网评估偏倚风险的工具独立评估试验质量。通过共识解决分歧。在可行的情况下,提取数据进行分析。

主要结果

八项对照试验(七项安慰剂对照试验和一项与活性治疗对照的试验),共664名参与者符合纳入标准。三项研究放疗的不良反应,三项研究化疗的不良反应,两项研究与乳腺癌治疗相关的更年期症状。两项偏倚风险较低的研究显示出益处:一项有254名参与者的研究表明,局部使用金盏花预防放疗引起的皮炎优于曲拉明(一种不含皮质类固醇的局部用药),另一项有32名参与者的研究表明,创伤紫(一种专利复方顺势疗法药物)作为漱口水治疗化疗引起的口腔炎优于安慰剂。另外两项研究报告了阳性结果,尽管偏倚风险尚不清楚,还有四项研究报告了阴性结果。未报告所使用的顺势疗法药物引起的严重不良反应或相互作用。

作者结论

本综述发现初步数据支持局部使用金盏花预防放疗期间急性皮炎以及创伤紫漱口水治疗化疗引起的口腔炎的疗效。这些试验需要重复进行。没有令人信服的证据表明顺势疗法药物对癌症治疗的其他不良反应有效。需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Homeopathic medicines for adverse effects of cancer treatments.用于癌症治疗不良反应的顺势疗法药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD004845. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004845.pub2.
9
Mistletoe therapy in oncology.肿瘤学中的槲寄生疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;2008(2):CD003297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003297.pub2.
10
Interventions for infantile haemangiomas of the skin.皮肤婴儿血管瘤的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD006545. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006545.pub3.

引用本文的文献

2
Integrative Approaches for Cancer Pain Management.癌症疼痛管理的综合方法。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2024 Jun;26(6):691-705. doi: 10.1007/s11912-024-01536-3. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
4
Homeopathy effects in patients during oncological treatment: a systematic review.顺势疗法在肿瘤治疗患者中的作用:系统评价。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 May;149(5):1785-1810. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04054-6. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
5
Complementary and Alternative Therapies in Oncology.肿瘤学中的补充和替代疗法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 21;19(9):5071. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095071.
9
[Complementary medicine in uro-oncology].[泌尿肿瘤学中的补充医学]
Urologe A. 2021 Jul;60(7):953-962. doi: 10.1007/s00120-021-01584-8. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of homeopathic therapy in cancer treatment.顺势疗法在癌症治疗中的疗效。
Eur J Cancer. 2006 Feb;42(3):282-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.09.025. Epub 2006 Jan 11.
10
The prevalence of complementary/alternative medicine in cancer: a systematic review.补充/替代医学在癌症中的流行情况:一项系统综述。
Cancer. 1998 Aug 15;83(4):777-82. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980815)83:4<777::aid-cncr22>3.0.co;2-o.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验