Lenza Mário, Belloti Joao Carlos, Andriolo Régis B, Gomes Dos Santos Joao Baptista, Faloppa Flávio
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Borges Lagoa, 783 - 5th Floor, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 04038-032.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15(2):CD007121. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007121.pub2.
Clavicle fractures account for around 4% of all fractures. Treatment of these fractures is usually non-operative.
To evaluate the effects of different methods for conservative (non-operative) treatment for acute (treated soon after diagnosis) middle third clavicle fractures in adolescents and adults.
We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 4), MEDLINE (from 1966), EMBASE (from 1980), LILACS (from 1982), trial registers and reference lists of articles. No language or publication restrictions were applied. The date of last search was in December 2008.
Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials testing conservative interventions for treating adolescents and adults with acute middle third clavicle fractures were considered. The primary outcomes were pain, shoulder function, health-related quality of life and time to return to previous activities.
Two authors independently selected eligible trials, assessed methodological quality and cross-checked data extraction. Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for dichotomous variables, and mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for continuous variables. There was no pooling of data.
Three trials were included in this review. Two trials compared the figure-of-eight bandage with an arm sling in a total of 234 participants. Both trials were underpowered and compromised by poor methodology. One trial found slightly higher pain levels in the bandage group at 15 days (mean difference 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 1.26; visual analogue scale: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)), and the other trial reported greater discomfort during bandage wear. There were no significant differences in functional or other outcomes reported for either trial. The third trial, which evaluated therapeutic ultrasound in 120 participants, was also underpowered but had a low risk of bias. The trial found no statistically significant difference between low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and placebo in the time to clinical fracture healing (mean difference -0.32 days, 95% CI -5.85 to 5.21 days) nor in any of the other reported outcomes.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence from randomised controlled trials to determine which methods of conservative treatment are the most appropriate for acute middle third clavicle fractures in adolescents and adults. Further research is warranted.
锁骨骨折约占所有骨折的4%。这些骨折的治疗通常是非手术治疗。
评估不同保守(非手术)治疗方法对青少年和成人急性(诊断后不久治疗)中1/3锁骨骨折的效果。
我们检索了Cochrane骨、关节和肌肉创伤组专业注册库、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(Cochrane图书馆2008年第4期)、MEDLINE(1966年起)、EMBASE(1980年起)、LILACS(1982年起)、试验注册库及文章的参考文献列表。未设语言或发表限制。最后一次检索日期为2008年12月。
纳入测试保守干预措施治疗青少年和成人急性中1/3锁骨骨折的随机和半随机对照试验。主要结局为疼痛、肩部功能、健康相关生活质量及恢复至先前活动所需时间。
两位作者独立选择符合条件的试验,评估方法学质量并交叉核对数据提取情况。二分变量计算风险比及95%置信区间,连续变量计算均值差及95%置信区间。未进行数据合并。
本综述纳入3项试验。两项试验比较了8字绷带与手臂吊带,共纳入234名参与者。两项试验样本量均不足且方法学欠佳。一项试验发现绷带组在15天时疼痛水平略高(均值差0.80,95%置信区间0.34至1.26;视觉模拟评分:0(无疼痛)至10(最严重疼痛)),另一项试验报告绷带佩戴期间不适感更强。两项试验报告的功能或其他结局均无显著差异。第三项试验评估了120名参与者的治疗性超声,样本量也不足但偏倚风险较低。该试验发现低强度脉冲超声与安慰剂在临床骨折愈合时间上无统计学显著差异(均值差 -0.32天,95%置信区间 -5.85至5.21天),其他报告结局也无差异。
随机对照试验提供的证据不足,无法确定哪种保守治疗方法最适合青少年和成人急性中1/3锁骨骨折。有必要进行进一步研究。