Suppr超能文献

青少年和成人中三分之一锁骨骨折的保守治疗干预措施。

Conservative interventions for treating middle third clavicle fractures in adolescents and adults.

作者信息

Lenza Mário, Belloti João Carlos, Andriolo Régis B, Faloppa Flávio

机构信息

Orthopaedic and Trauma Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627/701, São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, CEP 05651-901.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 30(5):CD007121. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007121.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clavicle (collarbone) fractures account for around 4% of all fractures; treatment of these fractures is usually non-surgical (conservative). Commonly used treatments are arm slings, strapping, figure-of-eight bandages and splints.This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of different methods for conservative (non-operative) treatment for acute (treated soon after injury) middle third clavicle fractures in adolescents and adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2013, Issue 12), MEDLINE (from 1966), EMBASE (from 1980), LILACS (from 1982), trial registers, orthopaedic proceedings and reference lists of articles. We applied no language or publication restrictions. The date of the last search was 29 January 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials testing conservative interventions for treating adolescents and adults with acute middle third clavicle fractures. The primary outcomes were shoulder function or disability, pain and treatment failure.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two authors selected eligible trials, independently assessed risk of bias and cross-checked data extraction. We calculated risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals for dichotomous variables, and mean differences and 95% confidence intervals for continuous variables. There was no pooling of data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three trials in this review with 354 participants. No new trials were included in this update.Very low quality evidence was available from two trials (234 participants) that compared the figure-of-eight bandage with an arm sling for treating acute middle third clavicle fractures. Both trials were underpowered and compromised by poor methodology. One trial found slightly higher pain levels in the bandage group at 15 days (mean difference 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 1.26; visual analogue scale: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)); and the other trial reported greater discomfort during bandage wear. There were no significant differences between the two interventions in functional or other outcomes reported for either trial.Moderate quality evidence was available from the third trial (120 participants), which evaluated therapeutic ultrasound. This trial was at low risk of any type of bias but was underpowered. The trial found no statistically significant difference between low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and placebo in the time to clinical fracture healing (mean difference -0.32 days, 95% CI -5.85 to 5.21 days), nor in any of the other reported outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence available from randomised controlled trials to determine which methods of conservative treatment are the most appropriate for acute middle third clavicle fractures in adolescents and adults. Further research is warranted.

摘要

背景

锁骨骨折约占所有骨折的4%;这些骨折的治疗通常为非手术治疗(保守治疗)。常用的治疗方法有手臂吊带、绑扎、8字绷带和夹板。这是对2009年首次发表的Cochrane系统评价的更新。

目的

评估不同保守(非手术)治疗方法对青少年和成人急性(伤后不久治疗)锁骨中段骨折的疗效。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane骨、关节和肌肉创伤组专业注册库、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(2013年第12期)、MEDLINE(自1966年起)、EMBASE(自1980年起)、LILACS(自1982年起)、试验注册库、骨科会议记录以及文章的参考文献列表。我们未设语言或发表限制。最后一次检索日期为2014年1月29日。

选择标准

测试保守干预措施治疗青少年和成人急性锁骨中段骨折的随机和半随机对照试验。主要结局为肩部功能或残疾、疼痛及治疗失败。

数据收集与分析

至少两名作者选择符合条件的试验,独立评估偏倚风险并交叉核对数据提取情况。我们计算了二分类变量的风险比和95%置信区间,以及连续变量的均值差和95%置信区间。未进行数据合并。

主要结果

本评价纳入了3项试验,共354名参与者。本次更新未纳入新的试验。两项试验(234名参与者)提供了极低质量的证据,比较了8字绷带与手臂吊带治疗急性锁骨中段骨折的效果。两项试验样本量均不足且方法学存在缺陷。一项试验发现绷带组在15天时疼痛水平略高(均值差0.80,95%置信区间0.34至1.26;视觉模拟评分:0(无疼痛)至10(最严重疼痛));另一项试验报告绷带佩戴期间不适更明显。两项试验报告的功能或其他结局在两种干预措施之间均无显著差异。第三项试验(120名参与者)提供了中等质量的证据,评估了治疗性超声。该试验存在任何类型偏倚的风险较低,但样本量不足。该试验发现低强度脉冲超声与安慰剂在临床骨折愈合时间上无统计学显著差异(均值差-0.32天,95%CI -5.85至5.21天),在其他任何报告的结局中也无差异。

作者结论

随机对照试验提供的证据有限,无法确定哪种保守治疗方法最适合青少年和成人急性锁骨中段骨折。有必要进行进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验