Suppr超能文献

程序性疼痛护理中的护理倡导

Nursing advocacy in procedural pain care.

作者信息

Vaartio Heli, Leino-Kilpi Helena, Suominen Tarja, Puukka Pauli

机构信息

University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2009 May;16(3):340-62. doi: 10.1177/0969733009097992.

Abstract

In nursing, the concept of advocacy is often understood in terms of reactive or proactive action aimed at protecting patients' legal or moral rights. However, advocacy activities have not often been researched in the context of everyday clinical nursing practice, at least from patients' point of view. This study investigated the implementation of nursing advocacy in the context of procedural pain care from the perspectives of both patients and nurses. The cross-sectional study was conducted on a cluster sample of surgical otolaryngology patients (n = 405) and nurses (n = 118) from 12 hospital units in Finland. The data were obtained using an instrument specially designed for this purpose, and analysed statistically by descriptive and non-parametric methods. According to the results, patients and nurses have slightly different views about which dimensions of advocacy are implemented in procedural pain care. It seems that advocacy acts are chosen and implemented rather haphazardly, depending partly on how active patients are in expressing their wishes and interests and partly on nurses' empowerment.

摘要

在护理领域,倡导的概念通常被理解为旨在保护患者法律或道德权利的被动或主动行为。然而,至少从患者的角度来看,倡导活动在日常临床护理实践中的研究并不多见。本研究从患者和护士的角度调查了程序性疼痛护理背景下护理倡导的实施情况。这项横断面研究以芬兰12个医院科室的耳鼻喉科手术患者(n = 405)和护士(n = 118)的整群样本为对象。数据通过专门为此目的设计的工具获取,并采用描述性和非参数方法进行统计分析。结果显示,患者和护士对于程序性疼痛护理中倡导的哪些方面得到实施的看法略有不同。倡导行为的选择和实施似乎相当随意,部分取决于患者表达愿望和利益的积极性,部分取决于护士的自主权。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验