Zhao Lixiang, Gao Song, Huan Haixia, Xu Xiaojing, Zhu Xiaoping, Yang Weixia, Gao Qingqing, Liu Xiufan
Animal Infectious Disease Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, PR China.
College of Clinical Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, PR China.
Microbiology (Reading). 2009 May;155(Pt 5):1634-1644. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.024869-0. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) and uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) establish infections in extraintestinal habitats of different hosts. As the diversity, epidemiological sources and evolutionary origins of extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) are so far only partially defined, in the present study,100 APEC isolates and 202 UPEC isolates were compared by their content of virulence genes and phylogenetic groups. The two groups showed substantial overlap in terms of their serogroups, phylogenetic groups and virulence genotypes, including their possession of certain genes associated with large transmissible plasmids of APEC. In a chicken challenge model, both UPEC U17 and APEC E058 had similar LD(50), demonstrating that UPEC U17 had the potential to cause significant disease in poultry. To gain further information about the similarities between UPEC and APEC, the in vivo expression of 152 specific genes of UPEC U17 and APEC E058 in both a murine urinary tract infection (UTI) model and a chicken challenge model was compared with that of these strains grown statically to exponential phase in rich medium. It was found that in the same model (murine UTI or chicken challenge), various genes of UPEC U17 and APEC E058 showed a similar tendency of expression. Several iron-related genes were upregulated in the UTI model and/or chicken challenge model, indicating that iron acquisition is important for E. coli to survive in blood or the urinary tract. Based on these results, the potential for APEC to act as human UPEC or as a reservoir of virulence genes for UPEC should be considered. Further, this study compared the transcriptional profile of virulence genes among APEC and UPEC in vivo.
禽致病性大肠杆菌(APEC)和尿路致病性大肠杆菌(UPEC)在不同宿主的肠外栖息地建立感染。由于目前肠外致病性大肠杆菌(ExPEC)的多样性、流行病学来源和进化起源仅得到部分界定,因此在本研究中,对100株APEC分离株和202株UPEC分离株的毒力基因含量和系统发育群进行了比较。两组在血清群、系统发育群和毒力基因型方面表现出大量重叠,包括它们拥有与APEC大型可传递质粒相关的某些基因。在鸡攻毒模型中,UPEC U17和APEC E058的半数致死剂量(LD50)相似,表明UPEC U17有潜力在家禽中引起严重疾病。为了进一步了解UPEC和APEC之间的相似性,将UPEC U17和APEC E058的152个特定基因在小鼠尿路感染(UTI)模型和鸡攻毒模型中的体内表达与这些菌株在丰富培养基中静态培养至指数期的表达进行了比较。结果发现,在同一模型(小鼠UTI或鸡攻毒)中,UPEC U17和APEC E058的各种基因表现出相似的表达趋势。在UTI模型和/或鸡攻毒模型中,几个与铁相关的基因上调,表明获取铁对大肠杆菌在血液或尿路中生存很重要。基于这些结果,应考虑APEC作为人类UPEC或作为UPEC毒力基因库的可能性。此外,本研究比较了APEC和UPEC在体内毒力基因的转录谱。