Hodgson John
Department of Academic Legal Studies, Nottingham Law School, Nottingham Trent University.
Br J Nurs. 2009;18(7):434-6. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2009.18.7.41659.
This article considers the impact of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), both in its own right since the 1950s, and in conjunction with the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) when this brought these rights home by incorporating them into the domestic law of the UK thus enabling our judiciary to give effect to them directly. The ECHR and the HRA say very little, if anything, expressly about health or health care, but have been relied on by litigants in a wide range of contexts, including but not limited to, assisted reproduction, abortion, access to treatment, management of health records, end of life issues and the investigation of potentially negligent or criminal conduct by professionals.
本文探讨了《欧洲人权与基本自由公约》(ECHR)自20世纪50年代以来本身所产生的影响,以及与1998年《人权法案》(HRA)相结合时的影响。1998年《人权法案》通过将这些权利纳入英国国内法,从而使英国司法机构能够直接实施这些权利,将这些权利引入国内。《欧洲人权与基本自由公约》和《人权法案》即便有关于健康或医疗保健的明确表述,也是极少的,但在广泛的背景下,包括但不限于辅助生殖、堕胎、获得治疗、健康记录管理、生命终结问题以及对专业人员潜在的过失或犯罪行为的调查等,诉讼当事人都援引了这些公约和法案。