Suppr超能文献

甲状腺滤泡样病变的细针穿刺活检:根据美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)建议进行诊断、管理及随访

Fine-needle aspiration of follicular patterned lesions of the thyroid: Diagnosis, management, and follow-up according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) recommendations.

作者信息

Faquin William C, Baloch Zubair W

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Diagn Cytopathol. 2010 Oct;38(10):731-9. doi: 10.1002/dc.21292.

Abstract

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) State of the Science Conference on thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) proposed that follicular patterned lesions can be divided into two diagnostic categories; follicular lesion of undetermined significance/Atypia of undetermined significance (FLUS/AUS) and suspicious for follicular neoplasm/follicular neoplasm (SFON/FON). The former group can benefit from repeat FNA (RFNA) to achieve a more definitive diagnosis and the latter should undergo surgical excision for histologic characterization (adenoma vs. carcinoma). In this study, we report the combined experience from our institutions with thyroid FNA cases that can be placed into NCI-designated thyroid FNA diagnostic categories for follicular patterned lesions.The case cohort comprised of 857 cases in 645 females and 212 males; 509 cases could be classified as FLUS/AUS and 348 as SFON/FON. Histologic follow-up was available in 273/509 (54%) cases diagnosed as FLUS/AUS and 251/348 (72%) cases diagnosed as SFON/FON.RFNA was performed in 203/509 (40%) patients classified as FLUS/AUS. RFNA diagnoses were: benign (125 cases), FLUS (46 cases), SFON/FON (20 cases), suspicious for papillary carcinoma (7 cases), papillary carcinoma (3 cases) and non-diagnostic (2 cases). The malignancy rate on surgical excision in the FLUS/AUS group was 27 and 15% with and without RFNA, respectively; and 25% in cases diagnosed as SFON/FON.RFNA is effective in managing thyroid nodules diagnosed as FLUS/AUS since the malignancy rates are different in cases with or without RFNA (27% vs. 15%). The malignancy rate (25%) in cases diagnosed as SFON/FON is similar to reported by other authors.

摘要

美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)甲状腺细针穿刺(FNA)科学现状会议提出,滤泡样病变可分为两个诊断类别:意义未明的滤泡性病变/意义未明的非典型病变(FLUS/AUS)以及滤泡性肿瘤可疑/滤泡性肿瘤(SFON/FON)。前一组可通过重复细针穿刺(RFNA)来获得更明确的诊断,而后一组则应接受手术切除以进行组织学特征分析(腺瘤与癌)。在本研究中,我们报告了我们机构中甲状腺FNA病例的综合经验,这些病例可归入NCI指定的滤泡样病变甲状腺FNA诊断类别。病例队列包括857例,其中女性645例,男性212例;509例可归类为FLUS/AUS,348例为SFON/FON。在诊断为FLUS/AUS的273/509(54%)例病例和诊断为SFON/FON的251/348(72%)例病例中可获得组织学随访结果。在归类为FLUS/AUS的203/509(40%)例患者中进行了RFNA。RFNA诊断结果为:良性(125例)、FLUS(46例)、SFON/FON(20例)、乳头状癌可疑(7例)、乳头状癌(3例)以及非诊断性(2例)。FLUS/AUS组手术切除时的恶性率在进行RFNA和未进行RFNA的情况下分别为27%和15%;诊断为SFON/FON的病例中恶性率为25%。RFNA在处理诊断为FLUS/AUS的甲状腺结节方面是有效的,因为进行RFNA和未进行RFNA的病例中恶性率不同(27%对15%)。诊断为SFON/FON的病例中的恶性率(25%)与其他作者报告的相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验