Chandra Smita, Chandra Harish, Bisht Sampan S
Department of Pathology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Ram Nagar, Doiwala, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Department of Otolaryngology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Ram Nagar, Doiwala, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
J Cytol. 2017 Jul-Sep;34(3):144-148. doi: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_234_16.
Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) of Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology has emerged as most controversial category due to its heterogeneity and inconsistent usage. Initially associated risk of malignancy was estimated to be about 5-15%, but eventually different results have been obtained across institutions due to variable follow-ups and interpretation. The present study was conducted to evaluate the rate of malignancy along with appropriate management in this category.
The study included AUS/FLUS cases diagnosed over period of 4 years on thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Detailed clinical history and radiological examination were recorded along with follow-ups and management of all cases. Histopathology was available for cases which underwent surgery due to high clinical suspicion, worrisome radiological features or two consecutive AUS/FLUS reports.
The incidence of AUS/FLUS was 6.4% with repeat FNAC done in 39.6%, immediate surgery in 49.2% and follow-up without intervention in 11.1% cases. The overall malignancy rate was 28.5% with most common malignancy being follicular variant of papillary carcinoma (FVPC). Malignancy rate was more in cases (24.1%) which morphologically showed atypical nuclear features in comparison to architectural atypia.
AUS/FLUS is associated with higher risk of malignancy than previously anticipated. Surgical intervention may have greater implication than repeat FNAC in appropriate management of this category. Substratification of this category according to nuclear features and architecture may be more useful in predicting malignancy risk and reducing the variability in the group.
甲状腺细胞病理学报告的贝塞斯达系统中意义未明的非典型性(AUS)或意义未明的滤泡性病变(FLUS),因其异质性和使用不一致,已成为最具争议的类别。最初估计其恶性风险约为5%-15%,但由于随访和解读的差异,各机构最终得到了不同的结果。本研究旨在评估这一类别中的恶性率以及适当的管理方法。
本研究纳入了4年间经甲状腺细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)诊断为AUS/FLUS的病例。记录了所有病例的详细临床病史、放射学检查以及随访和管理情况。对于因高度临床怀疑、令人担忧的放射学特征或连续两份AUS/FLUS报告而接受手术的病例,可获得组织病理学检查结果。
AUS/FLUS的发生率为6.4%,其中39.6%的病例进行了重复FNAC,49.2%的病例立即进行了手术,11.1%的病例进行了无干预随访。总体恶性率为28.5%,最常见的恶性肿瘤是乳头状癌的滤泡变体(FVPC)。与结构异型性相比,形态学上显示非典型核特征的病例的恶性率更高(24.1%)。
AUS/FLUS与比先前预期更高的恶性风险相关。在对这一类别进行适当管理时,手术干预可能比重复FNAC具有更大的意义。根据核特征和结构对这一类别进行亚分层,可能在预测恶性风险和减少该组的变异性方面更有用。