Boys Brian L, Kuprowski Mark C, Noël James J, Konermann Lars
Department of Chemistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada.
Anal Chem. 2009 May 15;81(10):4027-34. doi: 10.1021/ac900243p.
The exposure of solution-phase proteins to reactive oxygen species (ROS) causes oxidative modifications, giving rise to the formation of covalent +16 Da adducts. Electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry (MS) is the most widely used method for monitoring the extent of these modifications. Unfortunately, protein oxidation can also take place as an experimental artifact during ESI, such that it may be difficult to assess the actual level of oxidation in bulk solution. Previous work has demonstrated that ESI-induced oxidation is highly prevalent when operating at strongly elevated capillary voltage V(0) (e.g., +8 kV) and with oxygen nebulizer gas in the presence of a clearly visible corona discharge. Protein oxidation under these conditions is commonly attributed to OH radicals generated in the plasma of the discharge. On the other hand, charge balancing oxidation reactions are known to take place at the metal/liquid interface of the emitter. Previous studies have not systematically explored whether such electrochemical processes could be responsible for the formation of oxidative +16 Da adducts instead of (or in combination with) plasma-generated ROS. Using hemoglobin as a model system, this work illustrates the occurrence of extensive protein oxidation even under typical operating conditions (e.g., V(0) = 3.5 kV, N(2) nebulizer gas). Surprisingly, measurements of the current flowing in the ESI circuit demonstrate that a weak corona discharge persists for these relatively gentle settings. On the basis of comparative experiments with nebulizer gases of different dielectric strength, it is concluded that ROS generated under discharge conditions are solely responsible for ESI-induced protein oxidation. This result is corroborated through off-line electrolysis experiments designed to mimic the electrochemical processes taking place during ESI. Our findings highlight the necessity of using easily oxidizable internal standards in biophysical or biomedical ESI-MS studies where knowledge of protein oxidation in bulk solution is desired. Strategies for eliminating ESI-induced oxidation artifacts are discussed.
溶液相蛋白质暴露于活性氧(ROS)会导致氧化修饰,从而形成共价 +16 Da 加合物。电喷雾电离(ESI)质谱(MS)是监测这些修饰程度最广泛使用的方法。不幸的是,在 ESI 过程中蛋白质氧化也可能作为实验假象发生,以至于可能难以评估本体溶液中实际的氧化水平。先前的工作表明,在强升高的毛细管电压 V(0)(例如,+8 kV)下操作且使用氧气雾化气体并存在清晰可见的电晕放电时,ESI 诱导的氧化非常普遍。在这些条件下的蛋白质氧化通常归因于放电等离子体中产生的 OH 自由基。另一方面,已知电荷平衡氧化反应发生在发射器的金属/液体界面。先前的研究尚未系统地探讨这种电化学过程是否可能导致氧化 +16 Da 加合物的形成,而不是(或与)等离子体产生的 ROS 共同导致。以血红蛋白为模型系统,这项工作表明即使在典型操作条件下(例如,V(0) = 3.5 kV,N₂雾化气体)也会发生广泛的蛋白质氧化。令人惊讶的是,对 ESI 电路中流动电流的测量表明,对于这些相对温和的设置仍存在微弱的电晕放电。基于使用不同介电强度的雾化气体的对比实验,得出结论:放电条件下产生的 ROS 是 ESI 诱导蛋白质氧化的唯一原因。通过旨在模拟 ESI 过程中发生的电化学过程的离线电解实验证实了这一结果。我们的研究结果强调了在需要了解本体溶液中蛋白质氧化情况的生物物理或生物医学 ESI-MS 研究中使用易氧化内标的必要性。讨论了消除 ESI 诱导氧化假象的策略。