• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联邦政府对人类研究中弱势参与者保护措施的解释与执行。

Federal interpretation and enforcement of protections for vulnerable participants in human research.

作者信息

Iltis Ana S, Wall Anji, Lesandrini Jason, Rangel Erica K, Chibnall John T

机构信息

Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO 63103, USA.

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009 Mar;4(1):37-41. doi: 10.1525/jer.2009.4.1.37.

DOI:10.1525/jer.2009.4.1.37
PMID:19374484
Abstract

REGULATIONS AND POLICIES GOVERNING research, codes of ethics, and the research ethics literature reflect the need to provide special protections to vulnerable research participants. Nevertheless, there is disagreement about who is vulnerable and why, what protections are appropriate, and when to disallow research involving vulnerable persons. The Common Rule (CR) governs much of the human research conducted in the United States and the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) oversees much of this research. The CR requires special protections for pregnant women, fetuses, neonates, prisoners, and children. Although it also requires that researchers employ "additional safeguards" to protect other vulnerable persons, it does not define vulnerability or identify appropriate "safeguards." Very little is known about how OHRP interprets the "additional safeguards" requirement. We examined all letters of determination posted on the OHRP website between July 1, 2000 and December 31, 2006 (n = 636) to study the extent to which OHRP addressed, in its audits and investigations, the requirement to protect vulnerable persons. The letters did not reveal guidance on understanding vulnerability, determining whether a study includes vulnerable persons or protecting vulnerable participants. If institutions and investigators are to fulfill the ethical obligation to provide appropriate safeguards when conducting research on vulnerable persons, they must develop and implement mechanisms to identify and address vulnerability.

摘要

有关研究的法规和政策、伦理准则以及研究伦理文献都反映出有必要为易受伤害的研究参与者提供特殊保护。然而,对于谁是易受伤害者以及原因、何种保护措施恰当以及何时应禁止涉及易受伤害者的研究,存在不同意见。《共同规则》(CR)适用于美国开展的大部分人体研究,而人类研究保护办公室(OHRP)负责监督其中的大部分研究。《共同规则》要求对孕妇、胎儿、新生儿、囚犯和儿童给予特殊保护。虽然它还要求研究人员采取“额外保障措施”以保护其他易受伤害者,但并未对易受伤害性进行定义,也未确定适当的“保障措施”。对于OHRP如何解释“额外保障措施”要求,人们知之甚少。我们审查了2000年7月1日至2006年12月31日期间张贴在OHRP网站上的所有判定函(n = 636),以研究OHRP在其审计和调查中落实保护易受伤害者要求的程度。这些信函并未就理解易受伤害性、确定一项研究是否包括易受伤害者或保护易受伤害参与者提供指导。如果机构和研究人员要履行在对易受伤害者进行研究时提供适当保障措施的伦理义务,他们必须制定并实施识别和应对易受伤害性的机制。

相似文献

1
Federal interpretation and enforcement of protections for vulnerable participants in human research.联邦政府对人类研究中弱势参与者保护措施的解释与执行。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009 Mar;4(1):37-41. doi: 10.1525/jer.2009.4.1.37.
2
Protecting vulnerable subjects in clinical research: children, pregnant women, prisoners, and employees.保护临床研究中的弱势群体:儿童、孕妇、囚犯和雇员。
Respir Care. 2008 Oct;53(10):1342-9.
3
When neonatal ICU infants participate in research: special protections for special subjects.当新生儿重症监护病房的婴儿参与研究时:对特殊受试者的特殊保护。
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2009 Jun;21(2):277-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2009.01.007.
4
The ethics and regulatory landscape of including vulnerable populations in pragmatic clinical trials.在务实临床试验中纳入弱势群体的伦理与监管环境。
Clin Trials. 2015 Oct;12(5):503-10. doi: 10.1177/1740774515597701. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
5
Resuscitation research involving vulnerable populations: are additional protections needed for emergency exception from informed consent?涉及弱势群体的复苏研究:紧急情况下豁免知情同意是否需要额外保护?
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1071-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.020.
6
Conducting ethical research in pediatrics: a brief historical overview and review of pediatric regulations.开展儿科伦理研究:简要历史概述及儿科法规综述
J Pediatr. 2006 Jul;149(1 Suppl):S3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.043.
7
Perinatal substance abuse and human subjects research: are privacy protections adequate?围产期药物滥用与人体研究:隐私保护是否充分?
Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2003;9(1):54-9. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.10060.
8
The need for evidence-based research ethics: a review of the substance abuse literature.循证研究伦理的必要性:对药物滥用文献的综述
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Jan 12;86(2-3):95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.06.011. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
9
[Medical research and vulnerable subjects: unemployed people].[医学研究与弱势群体:失业者]
Przegl Lek. 2006;63(8):715-8.
10
Recruiting vulnerable populations for research: revisiting the ethical issues.招募弱势群体参与研究:重新审视伦理问题。
J Prof Nurs. 2003 Mar-Apr;19(2):106-12. doi: 10.1053/jpnu.2003.16.

引用本文的文献

1
Increasing burden of institutional review in multicenter clinical trials of infertility: the Reproductive Medicine Network experience with the Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PPCOS) I and II studies.多中心不孕临床研究中机构审查负担增加:生殖医学网络在多囊卵巢综合征妊娠(PPCOS)I 和 II 研究中的经验。
Fertil Steril. 2011 Jul;96(1):15-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.069. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
2
Parental permission and perceived research benefits in adolescent STI research.青少年性传播感染研究中的家长许可与感知到的研究益处
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Jun;5(2):57-64. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.2.57.