Oddone Francesco, Centofanti Marco, Iester Michele, Rossetti Luca, Fogagnolo Paolo, Michelessi Manuele, Capris Elisabetta, Manni Gianluca
G. B. Bietti Eye Foundation for the Study and Research in Ophthalmology-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jun;116(6):1106-11.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.020. Epub 2009 Apr 19.
To investigate the ability of sectorial analysis using the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 (HRT3) to discriminate between healthy and glaucomatous eyes and to determine whether this is affected by disc size and glaucoma severity.
Multicenter, cross-sectional evaluation of diagnostic tests.
Two hundred thirty-three eyes from 137 normal subjects and 96 glaucoma patients classified by the presence of a repeatable visual field defect.
Participants underwent imaging with the HRT3, and the diagnostic accuracy of stereometric parameters, Moorfields regression analysis (MRA), and glaucoma probability score (GPS) were analyzed sectorially by glaucoma stage and optic disc size.
Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC).
Of stereometric parameters, the cup-to-disc area ratio of the inferotemporal sector had the largest AUC (AUC, 0.74). Both MRA and GPS algorithms showed the best diagnostic accuracy in the inferotemporal sector, with a sensitivity and specificity of 63% and 88% for MRA and 80% and 62% for GPS, respectively. In small discs, sectorial MRA analysis had higher diagnostic accuracy than the global optic nerve head (ONH) analysis (sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 82% in the inferonasal sector), and these findings were confirmed in very large discs (sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 85% in the inferotemporal sector). Similarly, stereometric parameters discriminated better sectorially rather than globally, with different parameters giving the best results in different optic disc size subgroups. MRA sensitivity was weak in the early-glaucoma stage, with slightly higher figures if considered sectorially rather than globally. GPS diagnostic accuracy was very consistent across ONH sectors in each disc size and glaucoma stage subgroup, with no single sector demonstrating better diagnostic accuracy than the global analysis.
Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 sectorial analysis showed moderate diagnostic performance and may offer potential advantages over global analysis in the clinical diagnostic process. Small discs are classified more accurately by examining the inferonasal sector, whereas larger discs are classified more accurately by examining the inferotemporal sector. Neither HRT parameters nor classification algorithms seem to be good at the earlier stage of the disease.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
研究使用海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪3(HRT3)进行扇形分析以区分健康眼和青光眼眼的能力,并确定这是否受视盘大小和青光眼严重程度的影响。
对诊断测试进行多中心横断面评估。
来自137名正常受试者和96名青光眼患者的233只眼睛,根据是否存在可重复的视野缺损进行分类。
参与者接受了HRT3成像,并按青光眼分期和视盘大小对立体测量参数、 Moorfields回归分析(MRA)和青光眼概率评分(GPS)的诊断准确性进行扇形分析。
敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。
在立体测量参数中,颞下象限的杯盘面积比AUC最大(AUC为0.74)。MRA和GPS算法在颞下象限均显示出最佳诊断准确性,MRA的敏感性和特异性分别为63%和88%,GPS的敏感性和特异性分别为80%和62%。在小视盘中,扇形MRA分析比整体视神经乳头(ONH)分析具有更高的诊断准确性(鼻下象限敏感性为70%,特异性为82%),在非常大的视盘中也证实了这些发现(颞下象限敏感性为74%,特异性为85%)。同样,立体测量参数进行扇形区分比整体区分更好,不同参数在不同视盘大小亚组中给出最佳结果。MRA在青光眼早期阶段的敏感性较弱,按扇形分析而非整体分析时数值略高。GPS诊断准确性在每个视盘大小和青光眼分期亚组的ONH各象限中非常一致,没有单个象限显示出比整体分析更好的诊断准确性。
海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪3扇形分析显示出中等诊断性能,在临床诊断过程中可能比整体分析具有潜在优势。通过检查鼻下象限可更准确地对小视盘进行分类,而通过检查颞下象限可更准确地对大视盘进行分类。无论是HRT参数还是分类算法在疾病早期阶段似乎都表现不佳。
作者对本文讨论的任何材料均无所有权或商业利益。