• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

线性判别函数提高青光眼概率评分分析以检测青光眼视神经头:一项多中心研究。

Linear discriminant functions to improve the glaucoma probability score analysis to detect glaucomatous optic nerve heads: a multicenter study.

机构信息

Laboratorio clinico anatomo-funzionale per la diagnosi e il trattamento del glaucoma e della malattie neurooftalmologiche, Clinica Oculistica, Department of Neurological Sciences, Ophthalmology, Genetic, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2013 Feb;22(2):73-9. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31823298b3.

DOI:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31823298b3
PMID:21986567
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to create a linear discriminant function (LDF) formula by using the new Glaucoma Probability Score (GPS) global and sectorial optic nerve head parameters measured by Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 to improve the GPS diagnostic capacity to discriminate between healthy and glaucomatous eyes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a multicenter cross-sectional study. To calculate the LDF formula, 137 normal individuals and 96 glaucomatous patients were selected. Another independent sample of 60 healthy and 69 glaucomatous eyes was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the LDF formulas. All patients underwent a full eye examination, standard achromatic perimetry by using Humphrey Field Analyzer, and imaging with Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3. Glaucoma was defined on the basis of SITA-24-2 visual field loss (pattern standard deviation P<5% and glaucoma Hemifield test outside normal limits). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curves and sensitivity and specificity for different LDFs were analyzed as measures of diagnostic accuracy. The analysis was repeated after stratification for optic disc size and glaucoma stage.

RESULTS

Two LDF formulas improved GPS algorithm results. At fixed specificities of 85% and 95%, the sensitivity values were 79.7% and 71%, respectively, for the GPS-only LDF, which used only the so-called GPS parameters, whereas the values were 85.5% and 79.7%, respectively, for the GPS-RA LDF, which used sectorial rim area parameters as well.

CONCLUSIONS

When the so-called GPS parameters were used in an LDF formula, its diagnostic capacity slightly improved; however, the diagnostic performances of the GPS LDF, which used sectorial rim area parameters as well, were better.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过使用海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪 3 测量的新青光眼概率评分(GPS)全局和扇区视神经头参数,创建线性判别函数(LDF)公式,以提高 GPS 诊断能力,从而区分健康眼和青光眼。

方法

这是一项多中心横断面研究。为了计算 LDF 公式,选择了 137 名正常个体和 96 名青光眼患者。另外,还使用了 60 只健康眼和 69 只青光眼眼的独立样本,以评估 LDF 公式的诊断准确性。所有患者均接受了全面的眼部检查、Humphrey 视野分析仪的标准无彩色视野检查以及海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪 3 的成像检查。青光眼的定义基于 SITA-24-2 视野损失(模式标准偏差 P<5%和青光眼半视野测试超出正常范围)。通过分析不同 LDF 的受试者工作特征曲线下面积和敏感性及特异性,来评估诊断准确性。在对视盘大小和青光眼分期进行分层后,重复了分析。

结果

两种 LDF 公式改进了 GPS 算法结果。在固定特异性为 85%和 95%的情况下,仅使用所谓的 GPS 参数的 GPS 单独 LDF 的敏感性值分别为 79.7%和 71%,而同时使用扇形边缘区域参数的 GPS-RA LDF 的敏感性值分别为 85.5%和 79.7%。

结论

当在 LDF 公式中使用所谓的 GPS 参数时,其诊断能力略有提高;然而,同时使用扇形边缘区域参数的 GPS LDF 的诊断性能更好。

相似文献

1
Linear discriminant functions to improve the glaucoma probability score analysis to detect glaucomatous optic nerve heads: a multicenter study.线性判别函数提高青光眼概率评分分析以检测青光眼视神经头:一项多中心研究。
J Glaucoma. 2013 Feb;22(2):73-9. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31823298b3.
2
Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.使用海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪3对不同视盘大小和青光眼阶段进行基于扇区的分析:一项多中心研究。
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jun;116(6):1106-11.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.020. Epub 2009 Apr 19.
3
Exploring the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 diagnostic accuracy across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.探索海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪3在不同视盘大小和青光眼阶段的诊断准确性:一项多中心研究。
Ophthalmology. 2008 Aug;115(8):1358-65, 1365.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.01.007. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
4
Discriminating between normal and glaucoma-damaged eyes with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3.使用海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪3区分正常眼睛和青光眼损伤的眼睛。
Ophthalmology. 2008 May;115(5):775-781.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.06.032. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
5
Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 classifications: glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis.海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪3分类的诊断能力:青光眼概率评分与摩尔菲尔德回归分析对比
Ophthalmology. 2007 Nov;114(11):1981-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.015. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
6
Comparison between discriminant analysis models and "glaucoma probability score" for the detection of glaucomatous optic nerve head changes.判别分析模型与“青光眼概率评分”在检测青光眼性视神经乳头改变方面的比较。
J Glaucoma. 2008 Oct-Nov;17(7):535-40. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181622568.
7
Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography a study on diagnostic agreement with Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph.频域光学相干断层扫描视网膜神经纤维层成像-海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪诊断符合度的研究。
Ophthalmology. 2010 Feb;117(2):267-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.061. Epub 2009 Dec 6.
8
Glaucoma diagnostic capabilities of optic nerve head parameters as determined by Cirrus HD optical coherence tomography.Cirrus HD 光学相干断层扫描仪测量的视神经头参数对青光眼的诊断能力。
J Glaucoma. 2012 Sep;21(7):498-504. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318220dbb7.
9
The effect of disc size and severity of disease on the diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Glaucoma Probability Score.椎间盘大小和疾病严重程度对海德堡视网膜断层扫描青光眼概率评分诊断准确性的影响。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jun;48(6):2653-60. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-1314.
10
A comparison of the glaucoma probability score to earlier heidelberg retina tomograph data analysis tools in classifying normal and glaucoma patients.青光眼概率评分与早期海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪数据分析工具在正常人和青光眼患者分类中的比较。
J Glaucoma. 2008 Oct-Nov;17(7):513-6. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815f5332.

引用本文的文献

1
A Data Mining Framework for Glaucoma Decision Support Based on Optic Nerve Image Analysis Using Machine Learning Methods.一种基于机器学习方法的视神经图像分析的青光眼决策支持数据挖掘框架。
J Healthc Inform Res. 2018 Jun 20;2(4):370-401. doi: 10.1007/s41666-018-0028-7. eCollection 2018 Dec.
2
Assessment of the optic disc morphology using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.应用谱域光学相干断层扫描和扫描激光检眼镜评估视盘形态。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:275654. doi: 10.1155/2014/275654. Epub 2014 Jul 6.