Ferreras Antonio, Pajarín Ana B, Polo Vicente, Larrosa José M, Pablo Luís E, Honrubia Francisco M
Department of Ophthalmology, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
Ophthalmology. 2007 Nov;114(11):1981-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.015. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
To evaluate the usefulness of the glaucoma probability score (GPS), which does not require manual outlining of the disc boundaries, and the Moorfields regression classification (MRA), which requires manual outlining of the disc boundaries, for discriminating between healthy and glaucomatous eyes, using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph.
Cross-sectional study.
We prospectively selected 71 consecutive healthy subjects and 115 consecutive patients with open-angle glaucoma.
Participants were divided into 2 groups depending on the results of standard automated perimetry and intraocular pressure. All participants underwent imaging of the optic nerve head with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3. All tests were performed within 1 month of each subject's date of enrollment into the study by examiners masked to the other findings.
The sensitivity and specificity of all parameters of the MRA and GPS classifications were calculated. The diagnostic accuracy at different severities of glaucoma and optic disc sizes was also evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted for the GPS values.
The MRA global classification had a sensitivity of 73.9% and a specificity of 91.5%. The GPS global classification had a sensitivity of 58.2% and a specificity of 94.4%. The GPS had slightly higher sensitivity and somewhat lower specificity than the MRA when there was mild damage indicated by visual field tests. The MRA had the best discrimination capability for moderate and severe glaucoma. Both the GPS and MRA had lower sensitivity and higher specificity for small optic discs (<1.7 mm2) compared with medium and large discs.
In general, the diagnostic performance of the GPS was similar to that of the MRA. The diagnostic accuracy of both classifications depends on the optic disc size and the glaucoma severity.
使用海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪,评估无需手动勾勒视盘边界的青光眼概率评分(GPS)和需要手动勾勒视盘边界的摩尔菲尔德回归分类法(MRA)在鉴别健康眼和青光眼眼中的有用性。
横断面研究。
我们前瞻性地选取了71例连续的健康受试者和115例连续的开角型青光眼患者。
根据标准自动视野检查和眼压结果将参与者分为两组。所有参与者均使用海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪3对视神经乳头进行成像。所有检查均在每位受试者入组研究之日起1个月内由对其他检查结果不知情的检查者进行。
计算MRA和GPS分类所有参数的敏感性和特异性。还评估了不同青光眼严重程度和视盘大小的诊断准确性。绘制GPS值的受试者工作特征曲线。
MRA整体分类的敏感性为73.9%,特异性为91.5%。GPS整体分类的敏感性为58.2%,特异性为94.4%。当视野检查显示有轻度损伤时,GPS的敏感性略高于MRA,特异性略低于MRA。MRA对中度和重度青光眼的鉴别能力最佳。与中等和大视盘相比,GPS和MRA对小视盘(<1.7 mm2)的敏感性较低,特异性较高。
总体而言,GPS的诊断性能与MRA相似。两种分类的诊断准确性均取决于视盘大小和青光眼严重程度。