Shortt S E D, Hwang Stephen, Stuart Heather, Bedore Melanie, Zurba Nadia, Darling Margaret
Department of Community Health and Epidemiology; Department of Family Medicine; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, Queen's University, Kingston, ON.
Healthc Policy. 2008 Aug;4(1):108-22.
Homeless persons are numerous, carry a significant burden of illness and face challenges in accessing care. A search of the literature revealed insufficient empirical sources to permit the use of standard systematic review methodology to determine the most effective way to deliver point-of-first-contact healthcare to homeless people. Instead, we used a policy analysis approach. We found that the dominant model of primary care in Canada performs poorly when assessed on 13 evaluation criteria. While there is variable performance on individual measures, the three alternative models - targeted standard facility/clinic site, fixed outreach site and mobile outreach service - all perform well. Our findings suggest that some factor other than performance on the specified measures, such as costs, feasibility, geographical fit or local preferences, should be used to choose a specific model. Our analysis clearly indicates that the status quo model of primary care is inadequate to meet the needs of homeless people.
无家可归者数量众多,疾病负担沉重,且在获得医疗服务方面面临挑战。对文献的检索发现,实证资料不足,无法采用标准的系统评价方法来确定为无家可归者提供首次接触医疗服务的最有效方式。相反,我们采用了政策分析方法。我们发现,加拿大的主导初级保健模式在13项评估标准下表现不佳。虽然个别指标的表现存在差异,但三种替代模式——目标标准设施/诊所地点、固定外展地点和流动外展服务——均表现良好。我们的研究结果表明,应使用指定指标表现之外的其他因素,如成本、可行性、地理适应性或当地偏好,来选择特定模式。我们的分析清楚地表明,现行的初级保健模式不足以满足无家可归者的需求。