• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比利时 SCORE 风险图表对心血管死亡率的预测能力。

Predictive ability of the SCORE Belgium risk chart for cardiovascular mortality.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2010 Sep 3;143(3):385-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.03.101. Epub 2009 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.03.101
PMID:19386372
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The identification of persons at high cardiovascular risk is of primary importance in the context of cardiovascular prevention. Accuracy and precision of risk assessment are essential properties. We developed a calibrated SCORE risk chart (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation) for calculating the absolute 10-year probability of developing a fatal cardiovascular event, adapted to national mortality statistics and risk factor distributions in Belgium and critically evaluated its predictive accuracy.

METHODS

Our SCORE Belgium risk chart was validated using data from 6212 non-diabetic men and women free of CHD participating in a prospective cohort study carried out in the eighties (Belgian Interuniversity Research on Nutrition and Health). Agreement between numbers of predicted and observed CVD deaths across the entire spread of risk was studied using chi-square and Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics. Discriminatory power of risk estimates was evaluated according to Harrell's c-statistic.

RESULTS

During the period of 10 years, 274 CVD deaths were observed while the recalibrated risk chart predicted 263 events. The SCORE Belgium risk chart showed very good accuracy over the complete range of predicted risk (Hosmer-Lemeshow: P=0.14). ROC analysis revealed excellent discriminatory power in labelling future cases of fatal cardiovascular disease with a c-statistic of 0.86. The 5% threshold for the probability of 10-year cardiovascular death yielded an optimal balance of sensitivity and specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

The SCORE Belgium risk chart proves to be well suited as an accurate and precise estimation tool for the assessment of cardiovascular risk in Belgium.

摘要

背景

在心血管预防的背景下,识别心血管高危人群至关重要。准确性和精确性是风险评估的基本属性。我们开发了一个校准的 SCORE 风险图表(系统冠状动脉风险评估),用于计算发生致命心血管事件的绝对 10 年概率,该图表适用于比利时的全国死亡率统计数据和风险因素分布,并对其预测准确性进行了严格评估。

方法

我们使用 6212 名无冠心病的非糖尿病男性和女性的前瞻性队列研究(比利时营养与健康联合大学研究)的数据验证了我们的 SCORE 比利时风险图表。通过使用卡方和 Hosmer-Lemeshow 统计数据研究了整个风险范围内预测和观察到的 CVD 死亡数量之间的一致性。根据 Harrell 的 c 统计量评估风险估计的区分能力。

结果

在 10 年期间,观察到 274 例 CVD 死亡,而重新校准的风险图表预测了 263 例事件。SCORE 比利时风险图表在整个预测风险范围内显示出非常好的准确性(Hosmer-Lemeshow:P=0.14)。ROC 分析显示,在标记未来致命心血管疾病病例方面具有出色的区分能力,c 统计量为 0.86。10 年心血管死亡概率的 5%阈值具有最佳的敏感性和特异性平衡。

结论

SCORE 比利时风险图表非常适合作为比利时心血管风险评估的准确和精确估计工具。

相似文献

1
Predictive ability of the SCORE Belgium risk chart for cardiovascular mortality.比利时 SCORE 风险图表对心血管死亡率的预测能力。
Int J Cardiol. 2010 Sep 3;143(3):385-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.03.101. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
2
Recalibration and validation of the SCORE risk chart in the Australian population: the AusSCORE chart.澳大利亚人群中SCORE风险图表的重新校准与验证:澳大利亚SCORE图表
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Oct;16(5):562-70. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32832cd9cb.
3
Evaluation of cardiovascular risk predicted by different SCORE equations: the Netherlands as an example.以不同SCORE方程预测心血管风险的评估:以荷兰为例。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Apr;17(2):244-9. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328337cca2.
4
The ability of the SCORE high-risk model to predict 10-year cardiovascular disease mortality in Norway.SCORE高危模型预测挪威10年心血管疾病死亡率的能力。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007 Aug;14(4):501-7. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328011490a.
5
[Assessment of the absolute global cardiovascular risk: comparison between the risk chart and the individual score of the CUORE Project].[全球心血管绝对风险评估:风险图表与CUORE项目个体评分的比较]
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2006 May;7(5):359-64.
6
Poor predictive ability of the risk chart SCORE in a Danish population.风险评估表SCORE在丹麦人群中的预测能力较差。
Dan Med J. 2013 May;60(5):A4609.
7
Fewer deaths from cardiovascular disease than expected from the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation chart in a Swedish population.在瑞典人群中,心血管疾病导致的死亡人数低于系统性冠状动脉风险评估图表预期的数量。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Jun;16(3):321-4. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328322c760.
8
Evaluation of a recalibrated Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation cardiovascular risk chart: results from Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation Germany.重新校准的系统性冠状动脉风险评估心血管风险图表的评估:来自德国系统性冠状动脉风险评估的结果
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008 Aug;15(4):409-15. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282feec66.
9
[Calibrating the SCORE cardiovascular risk chart for use in Spain].[校准用于西班牙的SCORE心血管风险图表]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2007 May;60(5):476-85.
10
A consultation-based method is equal to SCORE and an extensive laboratory-based method in predicting risk of future cardiovascular disease.一种基于会诊的方法在预测未来心血管疾病风险方面与SCORE以及一种广泛的基于实验室检查的方法效果相当。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Oct;16(5):536-40. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32832b1833.

引用本文的文献

1
Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases Risk Assessment in Community Pharmacies: An Implementation Study.社区药店的糖尿病和心血管疾病风险评估:实施研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 17;19(14):8699. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148699.
2
Chest pain symptoms differences between diabetes mellitus and non-diabetes mellitus patients with acute coronary syndrome: A pilot study.糖尿病与非糖尿病急性冠状动脉综合征患者胸痛症状的差异:一项初步研究。
J Public Health Res. 2021 Apr 14;10(2):2186. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2021.2186.
3
Performance of risk prediction scores for cardiovascular mortality in older persons: External validation of the SCORE OP and appraisal.
用于老年人心血管死亡率风险预测评分的表现:SCORE OP 的外部验证和评估。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 9;15(4):e0231097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231097. eCollection 2020.
4
Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.弗拉明汉风险模型和队列汇总方程预测心血管疾病 10 年风险的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2019 Jun 13;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1340-7.
5
Re-calibration of coronary risk prediction: an example of the Seven Countries Study.冠状动脉风险预测的再校准:七国研究示例。
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 14;7(1):17552. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17784-2.
6
Health-related Factors Associated with Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening.与乳腺癌筛查依从性相关的健康相关因素。
J Midlife Health. 2017 Apr-Jun;8(2):63-69. doi: 10.4103/jmh.JMH_71_15.
7
Effect of using cardiovascular risk scoring in routine risk assessment in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews.心血管风险评分在心血管疾病一级预防常规风险评估中的应用效果:系统评价概述方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 8;7(3):e014206. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014206.
8
Limitations of the SCORE-guided European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention.基于SCORE风险评估系统的欧洲心血管疾病预防指南的局限性。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Aug 1;38(29):2259-2263. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw568.
9
Association of objective health factors with self-reported health.客观健康因素与自我报告健康状况的关联。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2014 Sep;55(3):101-7.
10
Effect of Antihypertensive Therapy on SCORE-Estimated Total Cardiovascular Risk: Results from an Open-Label, Multinational Investigation-The POWER Survey.降压治疗对SCORE评估的总体心血管风险的影响:一项开放标签、多国研究——POWER调查的结果
Int J Hypertens. 2013;2013:165789. doi: 10.1155/2013/165789. Epub 2013 Jul 25.