Masek Billie Jo, Arora Nick, Quinn Nicole, Aumakhan Bulbul, Holden Jeff, Hardick Andrew, Agreda Patricia, Barnes Mathilda, Gaydos Charlotte A
Johns Hopkins University, 530 Rangos Bldg., 855 North Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Jun;47(6):1663-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02387-08. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
Use of self-obtained vaginal specimens processed by nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) has significantly increased the utilization of nontraditional locations for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae screening programs. One important emerging source of such venues includes home-based self-sampling kits available via the Internet. The objective of our study was to evaluate the performance of three commercially available NAATs (Becton-Dickinson ProbeTec SDA, Gen-Probe Aptima Combo2 TMA, and Roche Amplicor PCR) for detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae in vaginal samples obtained via an Internet-based screening program. From July 2004 to August 2005, 500 self-collected vaginal swabs were tested for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae by using all three NAATs. Another 500 samples were collected between August 2005 and November 2007 and tested by ProbeTec and Combo2; PCR testing was discontinued due to low specificity for N. gonorrhoeae. All tests were conducted according to the manufacturers' procedures; the "gold standard" for an infected C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae patient was defined as > or = 2 positive NAAT results. Of the first 500 swabs submitted, 46 were C. trachomatis infected (9.2%) and 5 were N. gonorrhoeae infected (1.0%), and 3 of these were coinfected (0.6%). All C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae Combo2-positive/ProbeTec-negative samples were confirmed as true positives by an alternative NAAT. For C. trachomatis, ProbeTec, Combo2, and PCR had sensitivities of 82.6%, 100%, and 100%, with specificities of 100%, 100%, and 99.3%, respectively. For N. gonorrhoeae, ProbeTec, Combo2, and PCR had sensitivities of 80%, 100%, and 100%, with specificities of 100%, 100%, and 98.8%, respectively. Of the total 1,000 swabs submitted, 92 were C. trachomatis infected (9.2%) and 15 were N. gonorrhoeae infected (1.5%), and 7 of these were coinfected (0.7%). There were no ProbeTec-positive/Combo2-negative samples. For C. trachomatis, ProbeTec and Combo2 had sensitivities of 81.5% and 100%, with specificities of 100% and 100%, respectively. For N. gonorrhoeae, ProbeTec and Combo2 had sensitivities of 80% and 100%, with specificities of 100% and 100%, respectively. Overall, ProbeTec had 17 C. trachomatis false-negative results (1.7%) and 3 N. gonorrhoeae false-negative results (0.3%), while Combo2 had none. Our results were consistent with the sensitivities and specificities stated by the manufacturers. NAATs perform well for detection of chlamydia and gonorrhea with self-obtained vaginal swabs shipped in a dry state to a laboratory. For 1,000 self-collected vaginal swabs tested by NAATs, the sensitivities for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae for Combo2 were 100% and 100%, while they were 81.5% and 80%, respectively, for ProbeTec. For 500 PCR samples, the C. trachomatis sensitivity was 100% and the N. gonorrhoeae sensitivity was 100%, with specificities of 99.3% and 98.8%, respectively.
使用通过核酸扩增检测(NAATs)处理的自行采集的阴道标本,显著提高了沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌筛查项目中非传统检测部位的利用率。这类场所一个重要的新兴来源包括通过互联网提供的家庭自测试剂盒。我们研究的目的是评估三种市售NAATs(贝克曼库尔特公司的ProbeTec SDA、基因探针公司的Aptima Combo2 TMA和罗氏公司的Amplicor PCR)对通过基于互联网的筛查项目获得的阴道样本中沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌的检测性能。2004年7月至2005年8月,使用所有三种NAATs对500份自行采集的阴道拭子进行了沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌检测。2005年8月至2007年11月又采集了500份样本,并使用ProbeTec和Combo2进行检测;由于对淋病奈瑟菌的特异性较低,PCR检测被停止。所有检测均按照制造商的程序进行;沙眼衣原体或淋病奈瑟菌感染患者的“金标准”定义为NAAT结果≥2次阳性。在提交的前500份拭子中,46份感染沙眼衣原体(9.2%),5份感染淋病奈瑟菌(1.0%),其中3份为合并感染(0.6%)。所有沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌Combo2阳性/ProbeTec阴性的样本均通过另一种NAAT确认为真阳性。对于沙眼衣原体,ProbeTec、Combo2和PCR的敏感性分别为82.6%、100%和100%,特异性分别为100%、100%和99.3%。对于淋病奈瑟菌,ProbeTec、Combo2和PCR的敏感性分别为80%、100%和100%,特异性分别为100%、100%和98.8%。在提交的总共1000份拭子中,92份感染沙眼衣原体(9.2%),15份感染淋病奈瑟菌(1.5%),其中7份为合并感染(0.7%)。没有ProbeTec阳性/Combo2阴性的样本。对于沙眼衣原体,ProbeTec和Combo2的敏感性分别为81.5%和100%,特异性分别为100%和100%。对于淋病奈瑟菌,ProbeTec和Combo2的敏感性分别为80%和100%,特异性分别为100%和100%。总体而言,ProbeTec有17例假阴性沙眼衣原体结果(1.7%)和3例假阴性淋病奈瑟菌结果(0.3%),而Combo2没有。我们的结果与制造商公布的敏感性和特异性一致。NAATs对以干燥状态运送至实验室的自行采集的阴道拭子中衣原体和淋病的检测效果良好。对于通过NAATs检测的1000份自行采集的阴道拭子,Combo2对沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌的敏感性分别为100%和100%,而ProbeTec分别为81.5%和80%。对于500份PCR样本,沙眼衣原体敏感性为100%,淋病奈瑟菌敏感性为100%,特异性分别为99.3%和98.8%。