• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用焦点小组来设计一项基于互联网的衣原体筛查项目,该项目采用自行采集阴道拭子的方式:女性的需求。

The use of focus groups to design an internet-based program for chlamydia screening with self-administered vaginal swabs: what women want.

作者信息

Gaydos Charlotte A, Rizzo-Price Patricia A, Barnes Mathilda, Dwyer Karen, Wood Billie Jo, Hogan M Terry

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Sex Health. 2006 Dec;3(4):209-15. doi: 10.1071/sh05059.

DOI:10.1071/sh05059
PMID:17112429
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the opinions, concerns and perceptions of sexually active women to guide the development of an internet-based chlamydia outreach and screening program using self-administered vaginal swabs as a first step to prevention.

METHODS

Seven focus groups were conducted by trained facilitators. Questions were designed to initially open the discussion and elicit the members' own perceptions. Secondary, more probing questions were asked later to confirm participants' responses and elicit truthful answers. The main discussion topics were women's ideas about internet recruitment for chlamydia screening, preferred genital sample type, self-sampling at home using vaginal swabs and using the mail to return specimens. Participants were 42 women, aged 14-49 years. Structured discussions were facilitated using open-ended questions about access to chlamydia testing via the internet. Data were collected and reviewed for common themes and emphasis.

RESULTS

All women actively participated in the discussions, providing valuable information. The concepts of self-sampling and the overall project were viewed positively, along with draft advertisements, questionnaires and self-sampling instructions; some modifications were suggested. Common themes included offering free kits available within their community or by direct mail, as well as pre-addressed, stamped mailers for returning the kit to the laboratory for testing. Commonly perceived obstacles and potential risks included: maintenance of confidentiality; situations of embarrassment; and ensuring simplicity of packaging. Women indicated confidence in their ability to collect vaginal specimens and willingness to call for their test results.

CONCLUSIONS

Focus-group surveys were a useful tool and provided valuable feedback to inform the design of a specialised website to educate and facilitate access to chlamydia screening through home sampling.

摘要

目的

确定性活跃女性的意见、关切和看法,以指导开展一项基于互联网的衣原体宣传和筛查项目,该项目将自行采集阴道拭子作为预防的第一步。

方法

由经过培训的主持人主持进行了7次焦点小组讨论。问题旨在首先开启讨论并引出成员自己的看法。其次,随后提出更具探究性的问题,以确认参与者的回答并获取真实答案。主要讨论主题包括女性对于通过互联网招募进行衣原体筛查的想法、偏好的生殖器样本类型、在家自行使用阴道拭子采样以及使用邮件返还样本。参与者为42名年龄在14至49岁之间的女性。通过关于通过互联网进行衣原体检测的开放式问题促进结构化讨论。收集数据并审查以找出共同主题和重点。

结果

所有女性都积极参与讨论,提供了有价值的信息。自行采样的概念和整个项目受到积极评价,同时还有广告草稿、问卷和自行采样说明;有人提出了一些修改建议。共同主题包括在其社区内或通过直邮提供免费试剂盒,以及提供预先写好地址并贴好邮票的邮件封套以便将试剂盒返还实验室进行检测。普遍意识到的障碍和潜在风险包括:保密问题;尴尬情况;以及确保包装简单。女性表示对自己采集阴道样本的能力有信心,并愿意打电话询问检测结果。

结论

焦点小组调查是一种有用的工具,为设计一个专门网站提供了有价值的反馈,该网站旨在通过家庭采样来教育并促进衣原体筛查。

相似文献

1
The use of focus groups to design an internet-based program for chlamydia screening with self-administered vaginal swabs: what women want.运用焦点小组来设计一项基于互联网的衣原体筛查项目,该项目采用自行采集阴道拭子的方式:女性的需求。
Sex Health. 2006 Dec;3(4):209-15. doi: 10.1071/sh05059.
2
Internet-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to reach non-clinic populations with mailed self-administered vaginal swabs.基于互联网的沙眼衣原体筛查,通过邮寄自行采集的阴道拭子,覆盖非诊所人群。
Sex Transm Dis. 2006 Jul;33(7):451-7. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000200497.14326.fb.
3
Acceptability of the internet-based Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands and insights into nonresponse.互联网衣原体筛查在荷兰的可接受性及对无应答的洞察。
Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Jun;38(6):467-74. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318204546e.
4
Home STI testing: the adolescent female's opinion.家庭性传播感染检测:青少年女性的看法。
J Adolesc Health. 2004 Dec;35(6):462-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.01.006.
5
Chlamydia trachomatis age-specific prevalence in women who used an internet-based self-screening program compared to women who were screened in family planning clinics.沙眼衣原体在使用基于互联网的自我筛查计划的女性与在计划生育诊所筛查的女性中的年龄特异性流行率比较。
Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Feb;38(2):74-8. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182039d7f.
6
Chlamyweb Study I: rationale, design and acceptability of an internet-based chlamydia testing intervention.衣原体网络研究I:基于互联网的衣原体检测干预措施的基本原理、设计与可接受性
Sex Transm Infect. 2017 May;93(3):179-187. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052511. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
7
Can e-technology through the Internet be used as a new tool to address the Chlamydia trachomatis epidemic by home sampling and vaginal swabs?通过互联网的电子技术能否作为一种新工具,通过家庭采样和阴道拭子来应对沙眼衣原体的流行?
Sex Transm Dis. 2009 Sep;36(9):577-80. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181a7482f.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis screening via internet-based self-collected swabs compared with clinic-based sample collection.基于互联网的自我采集拭子与基于诊所的样本采集比较沙眼衣原体筛查的成本效益分析。
Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Sep;38(9):815-20. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31821b0f50.
9
Human Papillomavirus Infection in Women Who Submit Self-collected Vaginal Swabs After Internet Recruitment.通过网络招募后自行采集阴道拭子的女性中的人乳头瘤病毒感染
J Community Health. 2015 Jun;40(3):379-86. doi: 10.1007/s10900-014-9948-1.
10
Home screening compared with clinic-based screening for sexually transmitted infections.家庭筛查与基于诊所的性传播感染筛查比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;115(4):745-752. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d4450d.

引用本文的文献

1
How does online postal self-sampling (OPSS) shape access to testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs)? A qualitative study of service users.在线邮政自我采样 (OPSS) 如何影响性传播感染 (STI) 的检测机会?一项服务使用者的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):2339. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19741-x.
2
Comparison of Different Self-Sampling Devices for Molecular Detection of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs): A Pilot Study.用于人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)和其他性传播感染(STIs)分子检测的不同自我采样装置的比较:一项试点研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 28;10(3):459. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10030459.
3
Perceptions and Experiences of Internet-Based Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections: Systematic Review and Synthesis of Qualitative Research.
基于互联网的性传播感染检测的认知和体验:系统评价和定性研究综合分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 26;22(8):e17667. doi: 10.2196/17667.
4
Comparing mail-in self-collected specimens sent via United States Postal Service versus clinic-collected specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in extra-genital sites.比较通过美国邮政服务邮寄的邮件采集自采样本与临床采集样本在检测外生殖器部位沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌中的应用。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 14;12(12):e0189515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189515. eCollection 2017.
5
Home-based versus clinic-based specimen collection in the management of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections.沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌感染管理中家庭样本采集与门诊样本采集的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 29;2015(9):CD011317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011317.pub2.
6
Exploring pharmacy and home-based sexually transmissible infection testing.探索药房及家庭性传播感染检测。
Sex Health. 2015 Nov;12(6):472-9. doi: 10.1071/SH15031.
7
Internet testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in England, 2006 to 2010.英格兰 2006 年至 2010 年沙眼衣原体互联网检测。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Dec 19;12:1095. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1095.
8
Internet-based HIV and sexually transmitted infection testing in British Columbia, Canada: opinions and expectations of prospective clients.加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省基于互联网的艾滋病毒和性传播感染检测:潜在客户的意见和期望
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Mar 6;14(2):e41. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1948.
9
Home versus clinic-based specimen collection for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.家庭与诊所标本采集检测沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌的比较。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011 Feb;9(2):183-94. doi: 10.1586/eri.10.164.
10
Chlamydia trachomatis age-specific prevalence in women who used an internet-based self-screening program compared to women who were screened in family planning clinics.沙眼衣原体在使用基于互联网的自我筛查计划的女性与在计划生育诊所筛查的女性中的年龄特异性流行率比较。
Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Feb;38(2):74-8. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182039d7f.