Julien Dominic, O'Connor Kieron P, Aardema Frederick
Centre de Recherche Fernand-Sequin, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
J Clin Psychol. 2009 Jul;65(7):709-22. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20578.
The aim of the current study was to investigate whether intrusions of individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and nonclinical individuals differed in content and in context of occurrence. The results suggest that although the intrusions of OCD and nonclinical individuals are similar in content, they differ in their context of occurrence. Chi square analyses revealed that the intrusions of nonclinical participants were more likely to be directly linked than indirectly linked to observations in the here and now, whereas the intrusions of participants with OCD were more prone to be indirectly linked than directly linked to triggers in the environment at the time they occurred. The implications of the results for cognitive models of OCD are discussed.
本研究的目的是调查强迫症患者(OCD)和非临床个体的闯入性思维在内容和发生情境上是否存在差异。结果表明,尽管强迫症患者和非临床个体的闯入性思维在内容上相似,但在发生情境上存在差异。卡方分析显示,非临床参与者的闯入性思维更有可能与此时此地的观察直接相关,而非间接相关,而强迫症患者的闯入性思维在发生时更倾向于与环境中的触发因素间接相关,而非直接相关。本文还讨论了这些结果对强迫症认知模型的意义。