Rosentritt Martin, Behr Michael, Bürgers Ralf, Feilzer Albert J, Hahnel Sebastian
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Oct;91(1):257-63. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31397.
Plaque formation on dental ceramics may cause gingival inflammation and secondary caries. This in vitro study compared the susceptibility of various dental ceramics to adhere oral streptococci, and verified the influence of substratum surface roughness and surface hydrophobicity. Three zirconia ceramic materials and three veneering glass-ceramics were investigated. Fifteen test specimens were prepared for each material, polished, and surface roughness and hydrophobicity were determined. After incubation with artificial saliva (2 h, 37 degrees C) for pellicle formation, specimens were incubated with suspensions of Streptococcus gordonii DSMZ 6777, Streptococcus mutans DSMZ 20523, Streptococcus oralis DSMZ 20627, or Streptococcus sanguinis DSMZ 20068, respectively, for 2.5 h at 37 degrees C. Adherent bacteria were quantified using a fluorescence dye for viable cell quantification (Alamar Blue/Resazurin). Statistical analysis was performed using one- and two-way ANOVA and the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test for post hoc analysis (alpha < 0.05). Surface roughness and surface hydrophobicity differed significantly among the various ceramics; protein coating hydrophilized the surfaces, and led to a homogenization of the surface hydrophobicity of the various ceramics. Before protein coating, almost similar relative fluorescence intensities indicating similar adhesion of streptococci were found for the various ceramics; more distinct differences were observed after protein coating. Correlations between surface parameters and streptococcal adhesion were poor. Within the limitations of these experiments, the findings of this in vitro study indicate only little differences between zirconia and glass ceramic with regard to streptococcal adhesion. Judging from these results, it is unlikely that exposed zirconia surfaces yield more plaque than glass ceramic surfaces in vivo.
牙科陶瓷上的菌斑形成可能会导致牙龈炎症和继发龋。这项体外研究比较了各种牙科陶瓷对口腔链球菌黏附的敏感性,并验证了基底表面粗糙度和表面疏水性的影响。研究了三种氧化锆陶瓷材料和三种饰面玻璃陶瓷。每种材料制备15个测试样本,进行抛光,并测定表面粗糙度和疏水性。在用人工唾液孵育(2小时,37℃)以形成薄膜后,样本分别与戈登链球菌DSMZ 6777、变形链球菌DSMZ 20523、口腔链球菌DSMZ 20627或血链球菌DSMZ 20068的悬浮液在37℃下孵育2.5小时。使用荧光染料对活菌进行定量(Alamar Blue/刃天青)来量化黏附的细菌。使用单因素和双因素方差分析以及Tukey-Kramer多重比较检验进行统计分析以进行事后分析(α<0.05)。各种陶瓷之间的表面粗糙度和表面疏水性存在显著差异;蛋白质涂层使表面亲水,并导致各种陶瓷表面疏水性的均匀化。在蛋白质涂层之前,各种陶瓷的相对荧光强度几乎相似,表明链球菌的黏附相似;蛋白质涂层后观察到更明显的差异。表面参数与链球菌黏附之间的相关性较差。在这些实验的局限性内,这项体外研究的结果表明,在链球菌黏附方面,氧化锆和玻璃陶瓷之间只有很小的差异。从这些结果判断,在体内暴露的氧化锆表面产生的菌斑不太可能比玻璃陶瓷表面更多。